AI Rate Professor

English

Sally Jackson

ENGWR101 · ENGWR101CALLE · ENGWR100 · ENGWR301 · ENGLT311 · ENGWR303 · ENG310 · ENGWR300 · 73 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
2.94%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

unless you specifically want brutal writing standards and can protect your GPA elsewhere.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderNo extra creditStrict attendanceQuiz-heavyGPA risk
  • Vast majority of students warn that .
  • Attendance and and high-stakes.
  • A small minority say the toughness improved their writing long term.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students repeatedly report , and GPA damage even after hard work.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

20/100

, and picky paper standards make the course intellectually and logistically hard.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

after a few absences and skip-and-fail warnings.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

and the dominant student message is to take anyone else.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

; students cite point losses for formatting and unforgiving paper standards.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of homework, frequent reading quizzes, and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most students call lectures unhelpful or pretentious, though a minority credit lasting writing improvement.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and at least one high-stakes midterm or final.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews overwhelmingly call her a , and strict attendance.

Main concern

, and high risk of a damaged GPA.

What students said

“ if you value your GPA.”
ENGWR301
“ !”
ENGWR300
“She grades extremely hard and does not care about her students.”
ENGWR101
“Definitely NOT an easy A class, but will ensure to improve writing skills.”
ENGWR101CALLE

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and papers heavily control the grade, with harsh standards and little cushion from .

Weekly reading quizzesHigh-stakes midtermMany papersNo extra credit

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person courses use frequent reading quizzes, several major papers, and .

Weekly quizzesMajor papersHarsh paper gradingStrict attendance
“ and they really hurt your grade and ”
ENGWR300
“If you don't pass the mid-term, you don't pass the class.”
ENGWR101
“NO ”
ENGWR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you value your GPA. I have never made a B, but did after taking this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting harsh grading dominance with a small writing-growth minority. Credibility rating: High.

📉 GPA Warning

12/100

“If you value your grade stay away”

🪓

12/100

“She grades extremely hard and does not care about her students.”

📚 Rare Writing Benefit

55/100

“Without her being such a my writing skills.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • NO
  • The essays did not seem too bad but the and

Theme 2

📅

  • She drops you after 3 absences which is not okay.
  • . Poor class structure.
  • Lectures are pointless and do nothing to help you prepare for exams/papers.

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Outcomes

  • will ensure to improve writing skills
  • as you really see improvement in your writing.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

73

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty in-person reviews over many years show highly and GPA risk.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 513
3 out of 510
2 out of 55
1 out of 537

Course coverage

ENGWR30021 reviews
ENGWR10117 reviews
ENGWR3014 reviews
ENGWR1003 reviews
3001 review
Show 4 more courses
ENG3101 review
ENGLT3111 review
ENGWR101CALLE1 review
ENGWR3031 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

4

D 4

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1