AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carillon Larson

MATH335 · MATH400 · MATH103 · STAT300 · ALG100 · MATH420 · MATH34 · MATH120 · MATH401 · MATH100 · STATS300 · 79 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you self-study well and ; many students would not take her again.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest HeavyLots of HomeworkTough GraderLong Video LecturesPolarizing
  • Workload is heavy with long video lectures and .
  • Grades are driven by a .
  • Lower algebra reviews are warmer; stats and upper math reviews are often harsh.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

As are possible but usually require heavy studying and near-perfect .

; online still often forces campus exams.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Algebra can feel manageable with effort, but stats and upper courses feel convoluted and under-practiced for exams.

; in-person reviews split by course level.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, so skipping is risky.

In-person comments ; some online sections mark attendance no.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and recent comments .

Online and praise not reversing current tone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and reports of harsh partial credit or answer-only scoring are common.

Format shift

Harsh grading complaints appear in both formats, especially MATH400 and STAT/MATH tests.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

, and packets create a consistently heavy load.

Format shift

Both online and and long lectures.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and patient; many find videos boring, error-prone, or incomplete.

Format shift

Older algebra praise is warmer; newer online and upper-level reviews are harsher.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

A few tests often dominate the grade while .

Format shift

Online MATH120 explicitly cites four tests as about 75 percent of the grade.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Flipped-style setup with online lectures and in-class worksheets; polarizing, with and strict testing.

Main concern

, and occasional absenteeism or .

What students said

“Assigns an unreasonable amount of . The lectures are online which are extremely boring and around 2 hours long”
MATH100
“ .”
MATH400
“She is a wonderful professor. Be warned though - lots of homework. You want to pass you have to work hard.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ; video lectures are long and uneven, and .

Main concern

Not fully remote convenience; poor or error-prone lecture videos and .

What students said

“Beware, the online class requires going to campus for 4 tests. 75% of your grade is based on 4 tests”
MATH120
“Everything she teaches doesn't fully help with the homework so you will basically end up teaching yourself.”
STAT300
“ . For those who are thinking about taking her for the convenience of being completely online... think again.”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and little reported cushion from .

Test HeavyFew High-Stakes ExamsIn-Person Tests for OnlineNo Extra Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections are test-focused with and .

Test HeavyStrict Partial CreditShow Every Step
“Very strict . She grades by the amount of work shown”
MATH103
“Get the answer wrong? You won't get a .”
MATH400

Online

Online courses frequently .

Campus Tests RequiredTest HeavyFew Questions Per Test
“75% of your grade is based on 4 tests, which only have about 10-15 questions each”
MATH120
“ .”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and . I wish I didn't.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and and testing themes. Credibility rating: High.

📚

24/100

“Assigns an unreasonable amount of .”

📝

34/100

“75% of your grade is based on 4 tests, which only have about 10-15 questions each”

👎 Low Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

🎥 Polarizing Lectures

48/100

“Her televised lectures are super convenient, and I love the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • vid lectures suck but she's not terrible
  • She teaches clearly and I never really had to look anything up

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • NO
  • I had to study A LOT to get an A

Theme 3

📦 About Workload

  • lots of homework
  • # of homework problems ranges from 10 to 50 or more a night
  • Be prepared to set aside a lot of time for the lectures and homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

79

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across many years and courses with consistent themes on workload and testing support a high-confidence read.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 541
4 out of 59
3 out of 56
2 out of 512
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH12014 reviews
MATH10012 reviews
MATH4009 reviews
STAT3004 reviews
MATH3353 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH342 reviews
161151 review
ALG1001 review
MATH1031 review
MATH4011 review
MATH4201 review
STATS3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2