AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Sharee Tinti

GRAMMESLG · ESLG50 · ESLW50 · ESLW310 · GRAM320 · ESLW320 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

Take her if you mainly need to pass ESL writing; if .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy to passCaring but uneven teachingExtra credit availableClear when organizedGood for grade hunters
  • Most students say the class is easy and passable with light effort.
  • and and disorganized.
  • Attendance is often mandatory; and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students repeatedly say you can pass or get a solid grade with modest effort, , and idea-focused writing rather than harsh grammar cuts.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Average difficulty is low and many call the class easy if basics from prior ESL levels are solid.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, so skipping is risky.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Students who answered would take her again, mainly for easy passing and friendliness, despite strong complaints about teaching quality.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

, and idea-focused grading make grades more reachable than a hard writing class would suggest.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

62/100

Workload is generally light to moderate, though one review tags lots of homework and off-topic pacing.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

66/100

Many praise her as nice, helpful, and organized, but a loud , and unable to teach.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and participation rather than one pure exam or .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person ESL writing and grammar feel easy to pass with a friendly instructor, but organization and real learning quality vary a lot.

Main concern

Some students , and little learning despite easy grades.

What students said

“easy class just don'tt be lazy”
ESLW310
“If you .”
ESLW320
“If . If you want .”
ESLW50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests and writing are described as easy and short, with prep examples and lighter grammar weighting.

Easy short testsExamples before testsIdea-focused writing over strict grammar

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and writing that is not harshly graded on grammar.

Easy short testsExamples before testsExtra credit
“ and short. If you study, you will pass the class easily.”
GRAM320
“ .”
ESLW310

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If . If you want .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews, highlighting easy-pass themes versus uneven teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

66/100

“This instructor is organized, professional and helpful. .”

📈 Easy Grades

82/100

“easy class just don'tt be lazy”

⚠️ Organization Risk

40/100

“ and she just can't teach.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Tinti is a very nice, very good professor.
  • she is always off topic so you need to catch it out.
  • one of the worst and lazy teacher in sac city college.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • easy class just don'tt be lazy
  • .
  • If you .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she is the . friendly,helpful,and she makes the class easy.
  • Tinti is a nice teacher however she is a bad teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews spanning many years give a usable picture, but opinions split on teaching quality and many older comments lack grade detail.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESLW3206 reviews
ESLW3104 reviews
ESLW502 reviews
GRAM3202 reviews
ESLG501 review
Show 1 more courses
GRAMMESLG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values