AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Dan Sorenson

PHIL310 · PHIL12 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want an engaging philosophy professor and are ready to keep up with weekly reading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate instructorReading heavyGood feedbackAmazing online optionParticipation matters
  • and would take him again.
  • Online PHIL12 , and quizzes with flexible Sunday deadlines.
  • In-person students describe him as passionate and fun, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is available with consistent reading, discussions, and .

Online review details grading; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range and .

Both formats rate difficulty around medium; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and participation tags are emphasized.

Online explicitly requires participation; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Both reviewers call him amazing or the best and .

Strong praise appears in both online and in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Online student says discussion and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Weekly reading and but manageable load.

Format shift

Workload detail mainly from the online review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students describe him as amazing, passionate, and the coolest philosophy instructor.

Format shift

High praise is consistent across online and in-person.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Online mixes discussions, quizzes, and ; exams are not clearly described.

Format shift

Assessment detail mainly from the online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One older in-person review calls him the coolest, most passionate philosophy professor.

Main concern

Almost no detail on workload or .

What students said

“Best class with . Coolest dude ever and he's very passionate about what he does.”
PHIL310

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise generous feedback and and Sunday due dates.

Main concern

and participation matters.

What students said

“ but his gradings for discussions and !”
PHIL12

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and discussions more than .

QuizzesDiscussion postsWeekly homework

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review praises the class and professor but .

Online

Online , and quizzes with Sunday deadlines; proctoring is not mentioned.

QuizzesDiscussion postsSunday deadlines
“ but you have all week to complete it!”
PHIL12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took Dan under the Yuba College and I loved his class. but his gradings for discussions and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in-person). Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“He is an amazing instructor.”

📚 Reading Load

52/100

“ but his gradings for discussions and !”

👍 Recommendation

94/100

“Best class with . Coolest dude ever and he's very passionate about what he does.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is an amazing instructor.
  • Coolest dude ever and he's very passionate about what he does.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • but you have all week to complete it!
  • his gradings for discussions and !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews total, one online and one older in-person, so confidence stays low despite glowing tone.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL121 review
PHIL3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values