AI Rate Professor

History

Megan Randolph

HIST311 · HIST310 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Choose Randolph for online history only if you and careful reading; solid organization, but not a light course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy discussion boardsGet ready to readOrganized online layoutTricky multiple-choice testsClear grading criteria
  • Online history relies on weekly long discussion posts and .
  • Structure and video lectures are strong, but writing volume can feel exhausting especially in summer.
  • Tests are multiple choice but picky; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

One reported A, but weekly long posts and writing, not minimal effort.

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is manageable and discussion volume keep intellectual and time demand moderate to high.

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

Fully online with ; participation is via discussion boards and posted work.

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Two of and praise organization and lectures; one would .

All evidence is from online reviews; no in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

and ; tests can be tricky but expectations are transparent.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly multi-hundred-word discussions and history course.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Video lectures and organization earn praise; engagement is strong when students keep up with posts.

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Discussions and reading dominate; tests exist but the .

Format shift

All evidence is from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online HIST sections are organized with weekly videos or readings, frequent long discussion boards, and .

Main concern

Writing load of long weekly discussions and class.

What students said

“You have 1-2 discussions every week that are at least 500 words.”
HIST311
“ but tricky, you really have to read closely to find some of the answers.”
HIST311
“she uploaded a new video every week. Her lectures were insightful and I found myself engaged all semester long”
HIST310

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and textbook; reviews do not mention proctoring software.

Multiple choice testsTricky close-reading itemsDiscussion-board heavyOnline format

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online tests are multiple choice and tricky; weekly discussion boards of 500+ words dominate assessment, with .

Multiple choiceClose reading requiredWeekly discussionsNo proctoring mentioned
“ but tricky, you really have to read closely to find some of the answers.”
HIST311
“You have 1-2 discussions every week that are at least 500 words.”
HIST311
“I took her online class and she uploaded a new video every week.”
HIST310

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Randolph was amazing! I took her online class and she uploaded a new video every week. Her lectures were insightful and I found myself engaged all semester long which is sometimes rare for an online course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 online , and organization. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Her lectures were insightful and I found myself engaged all semester long which is sometimes rare for an online course.”

📚 Workload

32/100

“ unless you're ready to write 4 pages a week in .”

📝 Tests & Reading

55/100

“ but tricky, you really have to read closely to find some of the answers.”

👍 Mixed Recommendation

72/100

“ !”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Format

  • The
  • she uploaded a new video every week.
  • and the textbook are absolutely necessary.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • You have 1-2 discussions every week that are at least 500 words.
  • but tricky

Theme 3

📖

  • Get ready to read
  • quote from the lectures and textbook
  • this is what makes up for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 online reviews in a short window; themes are consistent but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST3112 reviews
HIST3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values