AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Cynthia Unmack

POLS301 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid this professor; reviews warn of condescending teaching and a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCondescendingLacks knowledgeDisorganizedAvoid
  • Students describe her as condescending and unprepared on political science topics.
  • Course felt disorganized and .
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

One student earned a B- with moderate difficulty ratings, but comments give little evidence of an easy A path.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty is rated mid-range and comments focus more on poor teaching than on content complexity.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students explicitly say not to take her again and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Limited grade data shows a B- with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say she lacks topic knowledge, is condescending, and leaves them knowing less.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person POLS301 feedback is sparse but harshly negative on knowledge and tone, with one empty older review.

Main concern

Condescending manner and .

What students said

“Professor lacked knowledge of her topics and was extremely condescending toward students.”
POLS301
“Do yourself a favor and ”
POLS301

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

details.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and ”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting teaching tone and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Professor lacked knowledge of her topics and was extremely condescending toward students.”

👎 Recommendation

10/100

“Do yourself a favor and ”

📚 Learning Outcome

20/100

“I felt like I knew less about political science after taking her course.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • extremely condescending toward students
  • The
  • lacked knowledge of her topics

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 3
  • B-

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews across many years, one empty, with low detail consistency.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

POLS3012 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values