AI Rate Professor

Geology

jennifer McHenry

GEOG300 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Skip this professor unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProIncorrect terminologyUseless study guideHarsh gradingMandatory attendanceHeavy reading
  • Students report forgotten lessons, wrong terms, and unanswered questions.
  • Study guides are called useless while .
  • Attendance and signal.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible but students , and strict grading for the grade.

Evidence comes only from the one in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty is rated high with and participation pressure.

Evidence comes only from the one in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

Evidence comes only from the one in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The and even reports her to the dean.

Evidence comes only from the one in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Student says she grades like a professional while instruction quality is weak.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from the one in-person review.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and not skipping class.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from the one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Lessons are incomplete, terminology is wrong, and questions go unanswered.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from the one in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments stress study guides and grading but .

Format shift

Evidence comes only from the one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person GEOG300 review paints a hard, poorly taught course with and .

Main concern

Weak lecture accuracy paired with and .

What students said

“This "professor" would forget parts of her lessons, give incorrect terminology, and fail to answer questions when asked for clarification by her frustrated students on a regular basis.”
GEOG300
“On top of a useless study guide, she has the audacity to grade like a professional while her work ethic is reckless.”
GEOG300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a useless study guide but .

Study guide criticized

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence criticizes study materials but .

Study guide criticized
“On top of a useless study guide, she has the audacity to grade like a professional while her work ethic is reckless.”
GEOG300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I've reported her to the dean for evaluation.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting instruction failures and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

22/100

“This "professor" would forget parts of her lessons, give incorrect terminology, and fail to answer questions when asked for clarification by her frustrated students on a regular basis.”

⚖️

25/100

“she has the audacity to grade like a professional while her work ethic is reckless.”

👎 Recommendation

15/100

“I've reported her to the dean for evaluation.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • forget parts of her lessons
  • give incorrect terminology
  • fail to answer questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Get ready to read
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • grade like a professional

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Single detailed review limits confidence despite vivid negative consistency.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GEOG3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values