AI Rate Professor

Math & Statisitics

R. Screechfield

MATH32 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

the course tough with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyLots of homeworkNot recommendedTough course
  • Single review rates quality at 1 and .
  • , and .
  • Only one short comment exists, so evidence is very thin.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and a reported C make an A look like hard work, not a free win.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The only comment simply calls it a tough course despite a low difficulty number.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Quality 1 and explicit no on taking the professor again.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and very low quality rating.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Only review gives quality 1 and would not take the professor again.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The sole in-person MATH32 review describes a tough course with and homework.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Tough course”
MATH32

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mark the class as , but give no open-book or .

Test heavyTough grader

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person the course is described as test heavy and .

Test heavyTough grader
“Tough course”
MATH32

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Tough course”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with minimal comment text. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

10/100

“No”

⚖️

18/100

“ ”

📝 Test Heavy

30/100

“Test heavy”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Tough course
  • Lots of homework
  • Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

15/100

Evidence confidence

A single short review with tags but almost no narrative detail makes reliability very low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH321 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values