AI Rate Professor

Math Statisitics

Carillon Larson

MATH120 · STATS300 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you want strong lectures and are willing to grind; do not expect an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing LecturesTough GraderLots of HomeworkClear Grading CriteriaNo-Nonsense
  • Lectures are praised as clear and amazing when the class is in person.
  • Expect and hard work; getting an A is not easy.
  • Online Stats felt stressful because study .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and hard-work comments show an A requires sustained effort, not minimal work.

Online review called her a ; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings sit near the top and students describe real stress and heavy lift content.

Both online Stats and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory with no flexibility signals.

and in-person sections.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Both students would take her again for strong teaching despite stress and hard work.

Recommendation is positive in both formats, with more frustration online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and stress over mismatched tests .

Format shift

; but hard work.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

LOTS OF and hard-work comments show a heavy ongoing load.

Format shift

; online focuses more on test stress.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Amazing lectures and approachability offset inconsistency and stress in online Stats.

Format shift

In-person quality is excellent; online quality is middling and more frustrating.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Multiple tests dominate the online narrative; .

Format shift

Online emphasizes four tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Hard but and lots of homework.

Main concern

You must work really hard; workload is heavy.

What students said

“I liked her class. You have to work really hard though. She is no-nonsense but easy to approach.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Kind but frustrating online Stats experience with inconsistent .

Main concern

Study guides may not match exams, creating high stress despite a passable outcome.

What students said

“I felt that the study guides were pretty inconsistent with what was on the 4 tests”
STATS300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and study guides may not fully match test content, raising stress.

Multiple TestsStudy GuidesInconsistent Alignment

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly detail exam format beyond hard work and .

Clear Grading Criteria
“She is no-nonsense but easy to approach.”
MATH120

Online

Four tests with study guides that students felt were inconsistent except the .

Four TestsInconsistent Study Guides
“the study guides were pretty inconsistent with what was on the 4 tests”
STATS300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I liked her class. You have to work really hard though. She is no-nonsense but easy to approach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews across online and in-person formats. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Amazing lectures”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“You have to work really hard though.”

😬

38/100

“It worked out alright in the end, but it was pretty damn stressful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is no-nonsense but easy to approach.
  • Professor Larson is generally a kind instructor
  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You have to work really hard though.
  • the study guides were pretty inconsistent with what was on the 4 tests

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews (2017-2019) across different courses and formats limit reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1201 review
STATS3001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values