AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Deborah Bryant

MATH300 · MATH335 · MATH103 · STAT300 · MATH34 · MATH123 · ONLINESTAT300 · MATH120 · MATH310 · STATS2331 · MATH401 · MATH402 · MATH100 · STATS300 · 97 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

unless you have no other option and are ready to fully teach yourself the material.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing Grading SystemTough GraderSelf-Teach RequiredOverwhelming HomeworkAvoid At All Costs
  • Nearly all students report if not done her way.
  • Lectures are described as , and often require heavy self-teaching.
  • Workload is heavy with while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Getting an A is extremely hard because , and correct methods can still be marked wrong.

Both online and easy As.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Course content is and tests that .

Online and in-person students both say the difficulty comes mainly from teaching and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, though several online sections list it as not required.

; online reports are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Would-take-again is effectively zero and .

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students report no partial credit, 100-or-zero homework, and answers marked wrong unless done her exact way.

Format shift

also noting grades lost or changed.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Many students report hours of daily homework, weekly quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online sections .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews describe unprepared lectures, poor explanations, ignored questions, and the .

Format shift

Teaching complaints dominate both online and in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Homework and quizzes often count little while , and .

Format shift

and graded-by-few-things policies.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe , and mandatory attendance with little learning value.

Main concern

Picky answer format on tests and a .

What students said

“ . You have 27 topics you must master if you get anything below 21 you fail the class.”
MATH310
“There were people who got correct answers but since they didn't do it her way they were marked wrong.”
MATH120
“even if you get the right answer she will still mark it wrong if it's not done the way she wants it done”
MATH103

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report , and high drop rates.

Main concern

and little useful instructor support.

What students said

“ . . Her lecture is awful.”
MATH120
“She has a point system that requires 100% or you get a zero on your grade.”
MATH120
“I've cant recall having had a class with .”
STAT300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are strict and picky, often closed-notes, with little partial credit and answers required her exact way.

Picky Answer FormatNo Partial CreditNo Notes AllowedTests Unlike HomeworkTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes, and give little or no partial credit.

Specific Answer MethodNo NotesNo Partial CreditTests Unlike HW
“ ”
MATH120
“No notes .”
STAT300
“She is very picky in how ”
MATH120

Online

Online students report confusing test grading, questions not covered, and .

Confusing Test GradingQuestions Not CoveredHeavy Exam Weight
“She also gives test that have questions that have not been gone over.”
MATH120
“Sometimes she gives test .”
ONLINESTAT300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolutely horrendous. . Majority of the class dropped (including me).”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and in-person formats, and teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

5/100

“Please for .”

📉 Teaching Quality

15/100

“When she is teaching she just does a problem then expects you to know what she ”

⚖️

12/100

“ and makes no sense.”

📚

18/100

“Be prepared to spend at least 4-5 hours a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • None of what she teaches makes any sense and I had to basically .
  • She gets so distracted while teaching and goes on random tangents.
  • and do not correspond to the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you dont finish your homework or even get one question wrong then she literally gives you a zero
  • It's really hard to get an A in this class.
  • Homework and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • She doesn't post any grades online or .
  • Barely answers back to emails.
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

97

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across many years and both formats show highly consistent negative themes.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 510
2 out of 523
1 out of 557

Course coverage

MATH12021 reviews
STAT3006 reviews
MATH1005 reviews
MATH4015 reviews
MATH3352 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH342 reviews
STATS3002 reviews
MATH1031 review
MATH1231 review
MATH3001 review
MATH3101 review
MATH4021 review
ONLINESTAT3001 review
STATS23311 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 4