AI Rate Professor

English

Jan Agee

ENG300 · WLD57 · ENG100 · ENGWR300 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

unless you already write clean academic English and only need a GE checkbox.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough grader on grammarBoring lecturesMany papersVague assignment guidanceEasy pass if strong writer
  • Grammar perfectionism and .
  • Lectures are often called boring, vague, or off-topic rather than skills-focused.
  • Course can be easy to pass for strong writers, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Strong writers who edit carefully can earn an A, but grammar pickiness blocks easy As for many others.

Both the online review and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

and a few essays, so content challenge is moderate if writing basics are solid.

pass; online evidence is thin.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation matters in multiple reviews.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Recent take-again answers are no, with warnings for international students and anyone needing real writing help.

; newer in-person and online reviews are clearly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

and grammar perfection comments outweigh occasional easy-pass remarks.

Format shift

Online review also stresses perfect grammar to pass.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Several essays, readings, and quizzes add up, but the course is not usually described as overwhelming.

Format shift

In-person SO ; online detail is limited.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students often call lectures boring, vague, or off-topic and say she does not teach how to write the assigned essays.

Format shift

A few older in-person students found her adequate; recent voices are harsher.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Same paper-heavy pattern appears online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ENGWR courses mix easy-pass comments with , and .

Main concern

Tough grammar standards and unhelpful essay guidance for students who need writing instruction.

What students said

“Very boring and pointless lectures. Shes very vague about how assignements should be done too.”
ENGWR300
“She won't give you A unless your grammar is perfect perfect.”
ENGWR300
“Easy A if you know how to write.”
ENG300

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative: distant teaching, politics rants, and perfect-grammar pressure.

Main concern

Little writing instruction and harsh grammar standards for passing.

What students said

“She was a terrible, distant, professor who's lectures were pointless and boring.”
WLD57

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on essays and special proctoring tools.

Reading quizzesMultiple essaysGrammar-focused grading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections use start-of-class reading quizzes and .

Reading quizzesFour essaysPicky grammar
“There is a quiz at the start of class about the . .”
ENG300
“She is very picky about grammar so you should proof read all your work.”
ENGWR300

Online

Online evidence mentions lectures and grammar standards but .

Grammar focused papers
“Class is not to difficult, but perfect grammar is a must in order to pass.”
WLD57

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Youre better off taking a English class with a different teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 English reviews, emphasizing grammar strictness, lecture engagement, and split ease versus teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Very boring and pointless lectures. Shes very vague about how assignements should be done too.”

⚖️

28/100

“She won't give you A unless your grammar is perfect perfect.”

👎 Recommendation Level

22/100

“If you don't plan on becoming an English major, or spending all of your time on .”

Theme 1

📝 About Papers and Grammar

  • She is extremely particular about grammar so if you are international students.
  • Easy A if you know how to write.
  • She does expect that you edit and use proper grammar.

Theme 2

😴 About Lectures

  • Very boring and pointless lectures.
  • Kinda boring though she sometimes goes off into useless topics.
  • I did not learn anything!!

Theme 3

🚪 About Taking Again

  • Youre better off taking a English class with a different teacher.
  • to fulfill GE requirements.
  • If I had the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews over many years with consistent grammar and boredom themes, but sample size and sparse grade data limit certainty.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGWR3007 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENG3001 review
WLD571 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1