AI Rate Professor

Math Statisitics

Stephanie Abundo

MATH342 · MATH120 · 342MATH · MATH100 · MATH104 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you can , and self-teach when lectures get confusing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringConfusing lecturesLots of homeworkExtra creditAccessible outside class
  • and cares; others say lectures are rushed, error-prone, and confusing.
  • and quizzes count, and plus office hours help if you show up.
  • Harder courses like MATH120/342 feel especially brutal when lecture clarity fails.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some earn A+ or B+ with full effort, but , and hard upper math make an easy A unlikely without heavy work.

In-person reviews dominate and show harder grade pressure; the one online review is milder with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Average difficulty near 4 with rushed lectures, lots of homework, and upper-level classes described as packed and hard.

Online MATH104 felt easier; in-person MATH120/342 reviews report much higher challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and warn that missing class means falling behind or not passing.

Both online and in-person comments stress show-up; and you will not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; the rest strongly warn against confusing lectures in harder courses.

Online review is positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, and fast test grading help, but graded by few things and .

Format shift

Online review highlights ; in-person comments mix leniency tools with high-stakes tests.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and packed upper-level content keep workload high.

Format shift

single online review.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Caring and accessible for some, but many report rushed board work, mistakes, shortcuts, and confusion.

Format shift

Online is mildly positive; in-person polarizes between excellent explainers and .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and occasional pop quizzes all count.

Format shift

; online notes homework, study, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

to rushed board work, mistakes, and confusion that drove some to drop; success usually requires attendance, homework, and reviews.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and board organization often break down, especially in tougher math courses.

What students said

“ . She tries to rush through problems, and makes mistakes.”
MATH120
“If you attend class, study and do the .”
MATH100
“ unless you are a genius in Math.”
MATH342

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The one online MATH104 review calls her caring and and flexible due dates, though lectures jump around subjects.

Main concern

Teaching can feel all over the place even when support and are strong.

What students said

“She a really great teacher, but she all other the place when teaching constantly changing subjects.”
MATH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and tests with some pop quizzes; open-book or proctoring software is not clearly proven.

Pop quizzesTests graded fastReview handouts before testsGraded by few things

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and pre-test review handouts; closed-book software proctoring is not stated.

Pop quizzesReview handouts before testsFast test grading
“if you do the review that she passes out before the ”
MATH100
“Only positive is that .”
MATH120

Online

The online review does not clearly describe exam format, webcam use, or open-book policy; and study.

Homework focusExtra credit
“Do the homework and study”
MATH104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She tries to rush through problems, and makes mistakes. ... ”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (1 online, 8 in . Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Support

70/100

“Professor Abundo really cared about every student! She is super smart and was really good at explaining math to me.”

⚠️ Lecture Clarity Issues

35/100

“ . She tries to rush through problems, and makes mistakes.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“If you attend class, study and do the .”

👍 Split Recommendation

52/100

“ unless you are a genius in Math.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • really good at explaining math to me
  • . She tries to rush through problems, and makes mistakes
  • all other the place when teaching constantly changing subjects

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you attend class, study and do the
  • Math 342 is everything you hated about math 120 crammed into a 3 unit class
  • she'll give

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • really cared about every student
  • always open to suggestions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across multiple math courses from 2017-2018 with detailed conflicting opinions provide a solid, if polarized, picture.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1043 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH3422 reviews
342MATH1 review
MATH1001 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 2