AI Rate Professor

Business

Cheryl Kaufman

BUS300 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
85.71%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you accept heavy group work and participation; online sections need more self-advocacy when logistics slip.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGroup-project heavyExtra credit availableParticipation mattersHomework heavyMixed subject depth
  • Many students praise care, patience, discussions, and paths to strong grades.
  • Class is assignment- and group-heavy with real participation and .
  • Online delivery drew complaints about mixed-up dates, while a minority call her disconnected or weak on content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Many A/A+ grades and help, but , and participation still require steady effort.

Online and in-person both report high grades; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Some call it easy while others call it challenging and .

Online difficulty ratings are moderate-high; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory with large participation and .

; online and most in-person say yes or participation-heavy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and many glowing reviews outweigh a smaller set of strong negative critiques.

Online is split yes/no; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

and makeup chances help, but tough-grader and .

Format shift

Online notes rubrics; and .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Homework heavy, , and participation keep the load high.

Format shift

Both formats mention substantial work; in-person especially stresses group activities.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

, and caring, but a minority say she lacks subject knowledge or is rude.

Format shift

Online logistics hurt one experience; in-person has both standout praise and sharp criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and participation outweigh pure exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize continuous work; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person BUS300 is discussion- and group-heavy with lots of homework, , and strong praise from many, plus a few harsh subject-knowledge critiques.

Main concern

Group work volume and mandatory participation points can overwhelm students who dislike teams.

What students said

“The most amazing professor that I ever had, lots of interesting discussion... lots of as well, easy class!”
BUS300
“If you don't like working with groups, you wont like her class.”
BUS300

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online BUS300 is mixed: one student learned a lot and and missing assignments despite decent grades.

Main concern

Course logistics and date mix-ups can frustrate online students.

What students said

“She had a hard time being an online professor. Dates would be mixed up with previous courses and she'd forget to assign things”
BUS300
“She is a great professor. You will learn a lot in this class.”
BUS300

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests track taught material while a large grade , and projects.

Lecture-Based TestsOnline Homework and QuizzesGroup ProjectsPresentations

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

online homework/quizzes and group work driving grades.

Lecture-Based TestsOnline Homework and QuizzesGroup ProjectsTwo Presentations
“Other than that . Lastly she assigns a lot of online hw and online quizzes”
BUS300
“You have 2 presentations during the semester.”
BUS300

Online

Online reviews ; assessment friction was more about assignment logistics.

Assignment Logistics IssuesRubric Used
“Dates would be mixed up with previous courses and she'd forget to assign things(but still expect us to do them).”
BUS300
“Also uses a rubric. Bleh.”
BUS300

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kaufman cares. She genuinely wants her students to succeed not just in business, but in life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (2 online, 8 in person), highlighting group workload, care, and mixed content depth. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She is one of the greatest teachers to learn from. and ”

👍 Recommendation

76/100

“I highly recommend her to anyone, specially to non-native English speakers like myself.”

👥 Group Work Load

35/100

“If you don't like working with groups, you wont like her class.”

🎁 Path

70/100

“lots of as well, easy class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The most amazing professor that I ever had, lots of interesting discussion
  • Kaufman cares. She genuinely wants her students to succeed
  • Has little knowledge of the topics being discussed

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but lots of chances to make up for if you don't do it
  • lots of as well, easy class!
  • this class was pretty challenging (in a good way)

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • She had a hard time being an online professor. Dates would be mixed up
  • She is a great professor. You will learn a lot in this class.
  • Participation and attendance are 200 points total for the whole semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across 2015-2018 with rich detail, both formats represented, and recurring themes around groups, workload, and recommendation.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BUS3009 reviews
BUS 3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values