AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Christina Beck

CHEM300 · CHEM305 · CHEM317 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you need a low-effort chemistry credit and do not care about learning depth.

Best fit · Easy A HunterDisinterested but niceShow up and passMandatory attendanceUnclear exam alignmentClear grading criteria
  • Students and worksheets with little learning payoff.
  • Teaching feels average to disengaged, especially with mixed-level sections.
  • As.
  • as mandatory for credit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students report As from showing up, worksheets, and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings and comments describe low intellectual demand, with and basic lab work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and say grades hinge on showing up and completing class work.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Quality , and students say you learn little.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Clear criteria and complete required work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

At least and ; others mainly require class presence and lab work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Students call her nice or average, but also disinterested, distracted, and hard to tailor instruction for mixed groups.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and lab participation, with exams present but unevenly described.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, and mixed expectations across courses.

Main concern

You may pass with little learning while feeling the instructor is distracted or and emails.

What students said

“Show up and pass, but con't expect to get anything out of it.”
CHEM317
“ and completing worksheets. .”
CHEM317
“she said all or questions on the and there were only 4 or 5 out of 65.”
CHEM305

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Some courses have no exams while another final .

No exam in some sectionsIn-person finalReview-to-exam mismatch

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

worksheets-only courses versus a .

No homework no examIn-person finalPrior-test review mismatch
“ and completing worksheets. .”
CHEM317
“she said all or questions on the and there were only 4 or 5 out of 65.”
CHEM305

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up and pass, but con't expect to get anything out of it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2014-2017, highlighting low-effort grading and uneven engagement. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Energy

42/100

“She's a , but she seemed disinterested and distracted.”

📈 Easy Pass Path

78/100

“ and completing worksheets. .”

👎

28/100

“No”

📝

48/100

“she said all or questions on the and there were only 4 or 5 out of 65.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she seemed disinterested and distracted
  • she was was an average teacher
  • A pretty good teacher, but i feel she expects a little to much from you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Show up and pass
  • and completing worksheets
  • Go to class and do the lab

Theme 3

⚠️ About Frustrations

  • hard for her to gear the class to a mixed bunch of students
  • can be quite flakely when it comes to returning emails
  • only 4 or 5 out of 65

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four detailed in-person reviews span 2014-2017 with consistent low-engagement themes, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM3172 reviews
CHEM3001 review
CHEM3051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1