AI Rate Professor

Nutrition

Jacqueline Bergman

NUTR300 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take NUTR300 with Bergman if you want a chill, caring, entertaining nutrition class that still feels easy to pass.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringHilariousFavorite professorExtra creditSuper chill
  • Students call her a .
  • NUTR300 is low-stress with a and .
  • but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Two reported As, low difficulty, a , and make an A very reachable with normal effort.

All evidence is from in-person NUTR300 reviews; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Average difficulty is low and students call the class fun and chill, though one early-semester review rated it harder.

All evidence is from in-person NUTR300 reviews; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Two of and participation tags appear often.

; no online comparison.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

and multiple students call her their favorite professor.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Reported As, caring feedback, and a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person NUTR300 comments.

Workload

Light

78/100

Students describe a super chill class with a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person NUTR300 comments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students , and UC Davis-level subject knowledge.

Format shift

Based only on in-person NUTR300 comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

The as a traditional exam-heavy setup.

Format shift

Based only on in-person NUTR300 comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person NUTR300 feels fun, supportive, and low-pressure with a and strong enthusiasm for the material.

Main concern

though the class is described as chill.

What students said

“Favorite professor. nutrion documentary. Super chill. Take this class.”
NUTR300
“Dr. Bergman is super funny and kept class entertaining!”
NUTR300
“I actually look forward to this class -- even at 7:30am on a Monday.”
NUTR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The only clearly described final is a chill paper on a nutrition documentary, which feels student-friendly.

Paper finalDocumentary paperChill assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as a paper on a nutrition documentary rather than a .

Paper finalDocumentary paper
“ nutrion documentary. Super chill.”
NUTR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Favorite professor. nutrion documentary. Super chill. Take this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 , and chill grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Dr. Bergman is super funny and kept class entertaining!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“I just started the semester with Dr. Bergman and .”

😌 Easy Chill Course

86/100

“Favorite professor. nutrion documentary. Super chill. Take this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dr. Bergman is super funny and kept class entertaining!
  • she was always super chipper and enthusiastic about the material
  • I actually look forward to this class -- even at 7:30am on a Monday.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • nutrion documentary. Super chill.
  • Favorite professor.
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Caring
  • Inspirational

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three 2017-era in-person reviews exist, all positive but limited in sample size and time span.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NUTR3003 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1