AI Rate Professor

Music

Wendell Yuponce

MUSM320 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

hands-on composition instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProIndustry ExperiencedPersonal Story HeavyAttendance CriticalMusic Business FocusNot Composition Focused
  • Strong industry experience in film/TV/commercial scoring and useful music-business info.
  • Students often say he teaches little actual music writing and tells too many personal stories.
  • and grades can be solid if you show up, but teaching skill reviews are mixed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

One student earned an A and difficulty is moderate, but and you will not pass.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ranges 1-4; content is industry talk more than rigorous music theory.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Tags and and skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

, but several students felt they learned little practical writing.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Reported A with feedback, but no strong evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Book rarely used; workload centers on class discussion and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Praised for knowledge and experience, criticized as not a strong teacher who overshares personal stories.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize class discussion and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person music industry course offers real-world knowledge but weak hands-on teaching and heavy personal stories.

Main concern

Limited practical writing instruction and frequent self-focused storytelling.

What students said

“Very knowledgeable yet humble. an A.”
MUSM320
“I signed up for the class wanting to learn about actually writing music, which I did not learn any of.”
MUSM320
“Good source of information concerning the music industry, but he tells too many personal stories during class time”
MUSM320

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; success .

Attendance CriticalLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews ; attendance is the clearest graded expectation.

Attendance Critical
“Skip class? You won't pass.”
MUSM320

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I signed up for the class wanting to learn about actually writing music, which I did not learn any of.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting industry expertise versus weak composition teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Not a good teacher, but has a lot of experience as a professional writer of music for film/TV/commercials.”

🎵 Industry Knowledge

75/100

“Very knowledgeable yet humble. an A.”

📖 Course Content Gap

40/100

“I signed up for the class wanting to learn about actually writing music, which I did not learn any of.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he tells too many personal stories during class time and trumps his own achievements often
  • Very knowledgeable yet humble

Theme 2

🎼 About Course Content

  • I signed up for the class wanting to learn about actually writing music, which I did not learn any of.
  • Good source of information concerning the music industry

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 reviews across 2004-2017 with mixed detail reduce reliability.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MUSM3203 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values