AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

L Leek

ESL50 · ESLR50 · ESLL40 · ESLW40 · ESLESL · ESLW50 · ESL30 · ESLW30 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you only need a pass and plan to teach yourself; she is rarely praised for actual teaching.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized teachingNice but ineffectiveDoes not know how to teachConfusing lecturesAvoid for learning
  • Most students say but cannot teach or organize a class.
  • Multiple if the goal is to learn ESL skills.
  • Workload and content can feel and lost work hurt the experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some call the writing easy with , but reported grades are mostly B-range and organization .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

ESL content is not advanced, yet confusion, weak teaching, and mixed difficulty ratings keep it from feeling truly easy.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory, with little sign that skipping is free.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

The dominant if you want to learn, despite a few fans who like her personality.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and tags mention , but lost work and late grades undercut trust.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Students report a lot of writing, yet some still call the class easy to pass rather than crushing.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and students learn little.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

ESL writing and homework dominate the comments; exams are barely mentioned.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and hard to learn from, with a few students liking her personality and lighter writing load.

Main concern

, and little real learning despite sometimes easy pass potential.

What students said

“she should not be a Professor ; she acts weird and does not know how to teach.”
ESLL40
“ ”
ESL50
“She is a but she is not a good teacher, doesent have a ”
ESLW30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Little exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and organization rather than a .

Homework-heavy focusLittle exam detail
“easy subject if you want just pss but no learn”
ESLW30
“write a lot but easy.”
ESLW40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she should not be a Professor ; she acts weird and does not know how to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews spanning 2007-2017, highlighting weak teaching against occasional praise for kindness. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“the worse teacher i never had. she don't know how to teach at all. you can learn nothing at her class.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ ”

🙂 Personality vs Skill

40/100

“She is a but she is not a good teacher, doesent have a ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • less organization in her class
  • students always confuse with what she said.
  • she doesnt know hot to teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • write a lot but easy.
  • easy subject if you want just pss but no learn
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she's cool. she's fun sometimes.
  • she is fine and .
  • The most awesome teacher ever!Very nice and helpful!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven in-person reviews span many years with consistent teaching complaints, but comments are short and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ESLL403 reviews
ESLW402 reviews
ESL301 review
ESL501 review
ESLESL1 review
Show 3 more courses
ESLR501 review
ESLW301 review
ESLW501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values