AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Chris Daubert

3DARTDESIGN · ART320 · ART · 3DDESIGN · ARTH324 · ART301 · OILPAINTING · ASIANART · ART450 · ART370 · ELEMDRAWING · ARTDESI · ART332 · ART312AND336 · ART310 · ART300 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want to grow as an artist and can handle honest critique and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerWorking ArtistConstructive CritiqueCreative FreedomTough but FairQuirky Mentor
  • Strong fit for serious art students who want real critique and skill growth.
  • , and materials; not an easy elective.
  • A few non-majors and older reviews call him unclear or arrogant, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

if you finish projects on time and , but slacking or weak effort shows.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Studio and design work demand practice, materials, and creative problem-solving rather than light busywork.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

as important for participation and progress, with some flexibility for excused absences if work is done.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students who want real art skill growth strongly recommend him; reported would-take-again is 100 percent.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Often fair with room for redo or improvement, though some call him a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of homework and project time outside class; materials runs and weekly drawings are common.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Praised as knowledgeable, inspiring, and strong at critique, with a minority noting arrogance or weak Photoshop instruction.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades revolve around drawings, paintings, critiques, and projects more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person studio and art history courses stress participation, critiques, and hands-on projects with a knowledgeable working artist.

Main concern

, and a personality some find rough or arrogant.

What students said

“He guides students outside of class, allows creative freedom, and encourages expression within the confines of the assignments.”
ART332
“My growth as a painter is due to his level of commitment to teaching his craft.”
ART332
“best art teacher I have ever had. if you are serious about art, you will learn allot and be challenged by chris.”
ART300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly project and critique based; art history sections may add tests or .

Studio CritiquesProject-Based AssessmentRedo AllowedTerm Paper in Art History

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and constructive critiques; some history courses use tests and long papers.

Studio CritiquesProject-Based AssessmentRedo Allowed
“ if you don't like the grade he gave you.”
ART332
“Critiques were very constructive.”
ART332
“He prepared me for UCD with his 10 page term paper for Asian Art!”
ASIANART

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“My growth as a painter is due to his level of commitment to teaching his craft. I owe much of my learning to his teaching and attentiveness.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 in-person reviews, highlighting studio teaching, critique, and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎨 Teaching Quality

74/100

“best art teacher I have ever had. if you are serious about art, you will learn allot and be challenged by chris.”

💬 Critique Style

80/100

“He gives honest and sometimes harsh critique but I like the honesty.”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“One of !”

⏱️ Workload Reality

32/100

“Don't slack off though, it'll bite you in the a**. Have to sort .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • allows creative freedom, and encourages expression
  • He wants you to figure things out for yourself
  • Deeply knowledgeable on the concepts of composing a creative image

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and you should be fine with grades
  • if you are just looking for an easy grade then why do you even bother
  • He is a strong but fair instructor

Theme 3

🎭 About Personality

  • He is a real character
  • quirky and funny
  • rude and condescending

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

34 in-person reviews over many years with rich detail and a clear majority pattern for serious art learners.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 58
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART3326 reviews
ART3005 reviews
ART3103 reviews
ART3203 reviews
ASIANART3 reviews
Show 11 more courses
3DDESIGN2 reviews
ART3012 reviews
ART3702 reviews
3DARTDESIGN1 review
ART1 review
ART312AND3361 review
ART4501 review
ARTDESI1 review
ARTH3241 review
ELEMDRAWING1 review
OILPAINTING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1