AI Rate Professor

Math Statisitics

Avelina Navarro

MATH28 · LEC17930 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative; most students report , and little learning support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo-show lateHarsh attendance policeDisorganized lecturesHigh-school style disciplinePop quizzes risk
  • Four of five reviews slam her as .
  • halls and public phone call-outs.
  • One and care, but is heavily outweighed by frustration.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Difficulty ratings are low on paper, but lots of homework, lecture-heavy structure, and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Content is basic math with low average difficulty, but poor organization and material itself.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and she chases students, marks absences strictly, and treats phones as public offenses.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Only one of ; most as a math instructor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Limited grade data and little cushion for mistakes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Tags and comments cite lots of , and pop-quiz risk.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most students describe disorganization, wrong or incomplete answers, rushing, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and lecture matter heavily, with pop quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MATH28 and lecture sections draw sharp complaints , and punitive attendance, with only one strongly positive outlier.

Main concern

Unreliable presence and punitive classroom management that feel high-schoolish rather than collegiate.

What students said

“For the past few weeks, she was late for class and the other day? She didn't show up? No call/no show!”
MATH28
“When I . I feel like I'm always being rushed.”
LEC17930
“She will treat you like your in high school.”
MATH28

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews stress pop quizzes and strict attendance more than formal exam format; .

Pop QuizzesAttendance-Linked Risk

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments warn about pop quizzes and failing if clearly.

Pop QuizzesSkip class risk
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MATH28
“Skip class? You won't pass.”
MATH28

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as a math instructor. When I . I feel like I'm always being rushed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and teaching chaos. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Reliability

25/100

“For the past few weeks, she was late for class and the other day? She didn't show up? No call/no show!”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ as a math instructor.”

📋

10/100

“She's like "I'm gonna make sure to mark you absent."”

🏫 Classroom Climate

30/100

“She will treat you like your in high school.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I feel like I'm always being rushed
  • she don't give you the right answer
  • most of the students seems distraught or confused

Theme 2

📋

  • No call/no show!
  • chase me down the hall and ask me for my name
  • If you use your phone in her class she will walk up to you and put you on blast
  • I'm gonna make sure to mark you absent

Theme 3

❤️ Rare Positive Note

  • There really needs to be more math teachers like Prof. Navarro
  • she makes it easy for you to learn math
  • she wants all her students to succeed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed 2017 in-person reviews with consistent negative themes and one positive outlier give moderate confidence despite small sample and age.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH284 reviews
LEC179301 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1