AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Lu Li

ENGR400 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Only consider if and slides; expect weak organization and skip if you need strong lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedReads slidesEasy contentFirst semesterGroup projects
  • Only one review from her first semester at SCC flags disorganization and slide reading.
  • Course content and problems are described as easy if you study the homework.
  • Student would not take her again due to weak lecture delivery and confusion answering questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Reviewer says she is easy and basic problems are given if you study the homework.

Evidence from the single in-person review only.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Difficulty rated 1 and content called basic and easy.

Evidence from the single in-person review only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and participation matters is listed as a tag.

Evidence from the single in-person review only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Student explicitly would not take her again after a .

Evidence from the single in-person review only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Course called easy with basic problems; .

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Workload

Light

74/100

Main advice is to study the homework; no heavy workload complaints beyond group projects.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

, and struggles answering questions.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Tags and comment emphasize homework, reading, participation, and group projects over exams.

Format shift

Based on one in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person review describes easy basic problems but and weak Q&A.

Main concern

Disorganization and inability to answer student questions clearly.

What students said

“She was very disorganized, she reads off her power-point word by word for her lectures, and at times she doesn't answer students questions due to confusion.”
ENGR400

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam format beyond advising students to study the homework.

Study the homework

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; student only notes basic problems and .

Study the homework
“Although, she is easy, basic problems are given. Study the Hw.”
ENGR400

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was very disorganized, she reads off her power-point word by word for her lectures, and at times she doesn't answer students questions due to confusion.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with low sample size. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Delivery

38/100

“She was very disorganized, she reads off her power-point word by word for her lectures”

🅰️ Easy Content

78/100

“Although, she is easy, basic problems are given. Study the Hw.”

👎

25/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesn't answer students questions due to confusion

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she is easy, basic problems are given
  • Study the Hw.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one first-semester review with limited grade detail; conclusions are highly uncertain.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR4001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values