AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Philip Dimare

PHIL352 · HRS180 · HIST170 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Worth considering for film or religious studies if , but expect mixed personality fit and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingKnowledgeableTough graderInspiring (online)Personality clash
  • glowing praise for knowledge and inspiration versus harsh personal criticism.
  • Online film course student found him amazing and earned an A .
  • , so experience may depend heavily on course and personality fit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

One A with ; another review says not that hard but still hostile in tone.

Online review mentions tough grader and ; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings range from 2 to 5 with limited detail on intellectual challenge.

Online difficulty rated 2; one in-person review rated 5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and participation matters as a tag.

; in-person comments do not clarify policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Strong recommendation from two reviewers and a .

Online and ; one older in-person review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

; not portrayed as an easy free grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Participation matters and feedback-heavy grading .

Format shift

Limited workload detail; online review emphasizes participation.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Highly praised knowledge and inspiration by some, harshly criticized arrogance by another.

Format shift

Online praise is strong; in-person reviews conflict.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments emphasize feedback and .

Format shift

Sparse assessment detail across formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews swing from awesome historical/philosophical insight to strong dislike of his attitude.

Main concern

Personality and tone may alienate some students.

What students said

“Wow! Awesome Teacher. He has a great hold on religious studies in general”
PHIL352
“What a horrible teacher. He thinks he's better than everyone, just because he is a Dr.”
HIST170

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online HRS180 student calls him amazing, inspiring, and , and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ . DiMare is an amazing professor, very inspiring and intelligent person.”
HRS180

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do ; toughness and participation are the main signals.

Tough gradingParticipation heavy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

“He's not that hard, but has small men syndrome.”
HIST170

Online

Online ; and participation matter.

Tough GraderParticipation mattersGives good feedback
“ ”
HRS180

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . DiMare is an amazing professor, very inspiring and intelligent person.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 mixed online and . Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Subject Mastery

70/100

“He has a great hold on religious studies in general, and a historical background to elucidate the reasons why various philosophies arose.”

⚖️ Polarizing Presence

40/100

“What a horrible teacher. He thinks he's better than everyone, just because he is a Dr.”

👍 Online Success

85/100

“Your excellent teaching skills and courteous personality has helped me tremendously through the semester.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • amazing professor, very inspiring and intelligent
  • great hold on religious studies
  • He thinks he's better than everyone

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He's not that hard
  • A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews across many years with sharply conflicting tone limit reliability.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

HIST1701 review
HRS1801 review
PHIL3521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values