AI Rate Professor

English

Michelle Beauttle

ENGWR51 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Strong pick for developmental English if you want support and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAlways willing to helpGreat written feedbackEasy-going English teacherPicky essay standardsNo-textbook friendly
  • Students and invested in their success.
  • , but she is picky about format and style.
  • ; do the work and you should pass with a solid grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Reported A- and B+ with doable papers if you follow her style and complete work.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Difficulty ratings are low and students say .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Both students rate her a 5 and , and that you will enjoy the class.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Passable if work is done; but not described as harsh overall.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

About 4-8 papers noted; volume is moderate but difficulty is low.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students , and genuine care for success.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is paper- and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Both in-person reviewers give top quality scores for helpfulness, feedback, and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She always there willing to help you! . She enjoys watching her students succeed.”
ENGWR51
“ , but she is picky on how she wants you to write them.”
ENGWR51

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews center on essays and homework rather than proctored exams, which feels student-friendly.

Essay-based assessmentNo formal exam proctoring mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

expectations, not camera-proctored tests.

Multiple essaysPicky writing standards
“ , but she is picky on how she wants you to write them. So Far we have done a total of about 4-8 papers.”
ENGWR51
“You will pass her class if you do your work!”
ENGWR51

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She always there willing to help you! . She enjoys watching her students succeed. You will enjoy her class!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting support and essay expectations. Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Student Support

92/100

“She always there willing to help you! .”

📝 Essay Style

78/100

“ , but she is picky on how she wants you to write them.”

👍 Passability

82/100

“You will pass her class if you do your work!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and , she is really easy going with the students.
  • She makes time after class if you need any help with work she gives, or .
  • She enjoys watching her students succeed.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • , but she is picky on how she wants you to write them.
  • You will pass her class if you do your work!
  • So Far we have done a total of about 4-8 papers.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two detailed in-person reviews from 2015-2016; consistent praise but very small sample.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR512 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values