AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Cissy Wong

ESLW310 · ESLL40 · ESLW50 · 17552ESLW · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want strict ESL writing standards and ; otherwise look elsewhere.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderStrict rulesPolarizing ESL teacherEssay feedbackLittle slack
  • Reviews split between students who found her friendly and and those who call her a .
  • Getting an A is widely described as difficult under her standards.
  • Small sample makes outcomes unpredictable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Multiple students say she is a As even with hard work.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty ratings and comments describe hard rules and heavy writing pressure.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Negative reviews warn first-semester students away despite a couple of strong positive notes.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students repeatedly call her a and rigid standards.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Writing workload is real, with essay comments and strict expectations, but volume is not fully detailed.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

; others call teaching poor and rules inflexible.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Essay writing and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

feedback to complaints about harsh grading and rigid rules.

Main concern

and inflexible expectations for first-semester or weaker writers.

What students said

“Crazy and !”
ESLL40
“I learned a lot from her comments on my essays.”
ESLW310
“Very strict teacher, she doesnt want you to get an A or could not see you get an A.”
ESLW50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essay grading .

Essay-based assessmentStrict grading standards

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Comments emphasize essay feedback and .

Essay commentsStrict paper grading
“I learned a lot from her comments on my essays.”
ESLW310
“Doesn't know how to grate and write a concise sentence even the students doing hard work.”
ESLL40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Crazy and !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting . Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

24/100

“Very strict teacher, she doesnt want you to get an A or could not see you get an A.”

🎯 Teaching Split

42/100

“She is friendly and intelligent.”

📝

70/100

“I learned a lot from her comments on my essays.”

👎 Recommendation

34/100

“If you want to face any problems in your .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is friendly and intelligent.
  • Horrible teacher. Its her way or no way even if it not the right way.
  • Poor teaching very hard rules.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Crazy and !
  • she doesnt want you to get an A
  • no matter what you wrote .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews, mixed quality and older .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ESLL402 reviews
17552ESLW1 review
ESLW3101 review
ESLW501 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values