AI Rate Professor

Math & Statisitics

Sasha Friedman

MATH100 · MATH342 · STAT300 · MATHV44 · STATS · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you will show up, do the homework, and use the practice exams; skip if and equal help for every student.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring when engagedPractice exams match testsMixed lecture clarityHelpful with snacks and study groupsSelective with help
  • Many students praise genuine care, study groups, and .
  • and fair, others say lectures are unprepared or dismissive.
  • Getting a high grade is and use the provided study guides.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

and several students report A or A+ with , so an A is achievable without heroic effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Content ranges from cake for some and dense stats, so intellectual challenge is moderate overall.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory, and success is tied to being in class and .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most students recommend him for care and or unsupportive moments.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

66/100

Described as a fair and and practice material aligning with exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and sometimes heavy, but not universally overwhelming across courses.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, and helpful, while a smaller group reports unprepared lectures and selective help.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams, with study guides and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person stats and math courses feel approachable for many, with caring moments and , but a minority report unclear lectures and uneven help.

Main concern

Lecture quality and support can feel uneven depending on whether you are one of the students he connects with.

What students said

“before the which is the exact same thing as the but with different numbers”
MATH342
“Lots of , but a great teacher!!!”
MATH100
“If you don't get it that's your problem.”
STATS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often highly predictable because practice guides closely match the real test, which students find friendly.

Practice exam matches real examTake-home practice examsExams based on lecturesQuizzes used to study

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

material, sometimes with identical problem structures.

Practice exam matches real examTake-home practice examsExams based on lectures
“ exams; both the practice exams and test exams are identical”
MATH342
“Exams are based on lecures so that ”
STAT300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Math with , and before the exam he gives you a practice examstudy guide which is the exact same thing as the but with different numbers. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 , and mixed lecture clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“He genuinely cares about students, I remember him saying, All of you are smart enough to get this.”

📝

78/100

“both the practice exams and . Really easy class.”

⚠️ Uneven Support

35/100

“If you were not one of those few he liked then good luck.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is straightforward and clear.
  • One of the .
  • His lectures were unclear half the time since he came unprepared.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class... !
  • Lots of , but a great teacher!!!
  • the and focused mostly on the early material.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He arranged study groups and even brought snacks!
  • He's super laid back and a .
  • If you don't get it that's your problem.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen detailed but older (2014-2015) in-person reviews show a , so confidence is moderate.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1004 reviews
STAT3004 reviews
MATH3422 reviews
3001 review
MATHV441 review
Show 1 more courses
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1