AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Genevieve Wallace

PHIL320 · PHIL300 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you like an upbeat quirky style and and detailed notes; avoid if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardQuirky and funnyTough detailed testsDaily homeworkExtra credit availablePolarizing
  • Personality is quirky, spunky, and entertaining for many students
  • Grading and ; some call it a nightmare
  • an A for prepared students

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some get an easy A from homework and , but and failed essays.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, yet pace and detail depth make it feel hard for many.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Fans love her personality and ; and call the class a nightmare.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Described as fair by some but tough and detail-obsessed by others, including failing most of the class on an essay.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

while, plus reading and and exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Quirky, funny, and straightforward for supporters; options.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and finals all matter; can help.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person PHIL courses with daily homework, multiple-choice or , and a quirky fun personality that splits opinions.

Main concern

Harsh or and very specific test questions for some students.

What students said

“There is , and it takes a while. Other than that, the .”
PHIL300
“ . Questions on the tests were VERY specific to details rather than subject matter.”
PHIL300
“As long as you do the HW, you can get an easy A in the class.”
PHIL300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

specific hard midterms/finals; can soften the blow.

Multiple choice testsVery specific detail questionsHard midterm and finalExtra credit available

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

plus hard detail-heavy midterms and finals; online quizzes are pass/fail out of 10.

Multiple choiceDetail-specific questionsHard midterm and finalPass/fail online quizzes
“ , and as long as you study the notes from the lecture, you will do well.”
PHIL300
“Questions on the subject matter.”
PHIL300
“The Midterm and .”
PHIL300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lover of life, quirky, spunky, and funny. Enjoyed her personality and method of teaching but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎭 Quirky Personality

70/100

“Lover of life, quirky, spunky, and funny.”

⚖️

38/100

“ . Questions on the tests were VERY specific to details rather than subject matter.”

📚

60/100

“As long as you do the HW, you can get an easy A in the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • quirky and always has an upbeat personality
  • She is a straightforward teacher and tells you exactly what to study for
  • She is really fun and definitely keeps you entertained in class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is , and it takes a while
  • she failed most of the class on the first essay
  • , because it can help bump up your grade

Theme 3

⚠️ Polarizing Outcomes

  • if you wish to pass let alone understand the material
  • This class was a nightmare
  • Excellent professor that makes the class interesting and fun

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven in-person reviews from 2013-2015 with mixed but detailed opinions give a usable, moderately consistent polarizing picture.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHIL3005 reviews
3001 review
PHIL3201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values