AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Irina Kloumova

MATH335 · MATH103 · STAT300 · MATH420 · MATH120 · TRIG335 · MATH370 · ELEMALG · 335TRIG · MATH402 · MATH100 · 137 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you already excel at math and want bootcamp-level prep; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCondescending StyleThick AccentMath BootcampWeeds Out Weak StudentsPolarizing
  • Many students call her rude, unhelpful, and hard to understand due to accent and speed.
  • Strong math students who grind can learn a lot and sometimes get an A at 85%.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even admirers say they worked their butt off; and half-problems can score zero.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

, and weak algebra backgrounds get crushed.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and say she packs 2+ hours of material you cannot miss.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

; only strong, self-driven math students recommend her.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; and partial work often earns zero.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Expect 2-5 hours homework and heavy weekly study.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some call her dedicated and thorough, but many report yelling, walking away from questions, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

but often not collected; quizzes and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, tough tests, and a strong accent; polarizing between dedicated admirers and students who drop.

Main concern

Condescending responses to questions, accent barriers, and and withdrawal rates.

What students said

“ !!”
MATH120
“There is a difference between a challenging, difficult professor and an abusive one.”
MATH120
“85%+ is an A which isn't hard to get if you put in the effort.”
MATH402

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and and little mercy for incomplete work.

Tough test gradingTimed problemsReview sheetsHarsh partial credit

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

sheets that match tests, and severe point cuts for small mistakes.

Tough testsTimed problemsReview sheetsHarsh grading
“your score will be deducted dramatically when you make any mistake”
MATH420
“ !”
MATH335

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There is a difference between a challenging, difficult professor and an abusive one. Kloumova falls in the latter category. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting climate, difficulty, and polarizing prep value. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Good mathematician, COMPLETELY ineffective instructor.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ !”

⚖️

22/100

“ and it is incredibly difficult to understand what she is saying.”

🔥 For Hardcore Students

70/100

“Undeniably the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She works fast and expects you to keep up and do timed problems.
  • Constantly patronizing students who can't follow her rushed lectures.
  • You should already know this.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I BARELY got an A in her class, but I worked my butt off for that A.
  • half the
  • 85% = A!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She is very mean! WARNING!
  • Students were afraid to ask questions in class due to her remarks.
  • If you enjoy a strict teacher who has a knack for .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

137

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 in-person reviews spanning years show a consistent split: harsh for average students, valued by math-strong grinders.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 521
3 out of 512
2 out of 520
1 out of 551

Course coverage

MATH12019 reviews
MATH3359 reviews
MATH4028 reviews
MATH3705 reviews
1202 reviews
Show 7 more courses
335TRIG1 review
ELEMALG1 review
MATH1001 review
MATH1031 review
MATH4201 review
STAT3001 review
TRIG3351 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1