AI Rate Professor

English

Karen Stevens

ENGWR100 · ENGLISH100 · ENDWR100 · ENGWRI100 · ENGLISH301 · COLLEGEWRI100 · CG225 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

unless you specifically want a strict, high-expectation writing class and can handle uneven teaching.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBrutal Essay GradingUnorganized LessonsStrict AttendanceHard QuizzesUnclear Feedback
  • Many students say she , and .
  • Writing and and hard quizzes.
  • A few students who want serious writing practice still find her useful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students report , and hard quizzes, so an A requires heavy effort with uncertain reward.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Frequent essays, daily reading, and students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple reviews say missing about four days can get you dropped, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most comments , and weak preparation for finals.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly call essay and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly essays, daily reading, and students.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Common complaints , and students teaching themselves.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews; a small minority defend her.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

42/100

, and frequent writing rather than a single balanced mix.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English reviews are mostly negative about organization, clarity, and helps serious writers.

Main concern

Brutal grading, unclear teaching, and .

What students said

“Teacher is so hard to please and has high expectations.”
ENGWR100
“ and a terrible english writing prfessor.”
ENGWR100
“ .”
COLLEGEWRI100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and frequent essays; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring software or open-book exams.

Hard Reading QuizzesWeekly EssaysStrict Attendance Linked

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essay grading, without clear proctoring details.

Reading QuizzesWeekly EssaysHard Grading
“ memorize every bit details from a 4-page article”
ENGWR100
“she makes you take about 6 quizes on readings which she grades hard.”
ENDWR100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“OH MY GOD! !”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 and organization complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ and a terrible english writing prfessor.”

⚖️

22/100

“ .”

🚫 Recommendation Level

24/100

“ .”

📅

18/100

“you can only miss 4 days of class then you will be dropped.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she shows up with no lesson plan, and sort of spurts along.
  • You go to class and teaches yourself, because she does not know how to.
  • She will assign you an essay and change the format on how it's supposed to be done the day before it's due.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Teacher is so hard to please and has high expectations.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Management

  • you can only miss 4 days of class then you will be dropped.
  • You can't leave class when you want.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen mostly detailed reviews form a consistent negative pattern, but almost all are from 2004-2005 plus one 2014 outlier.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENGWR1006 reviews
ENGLISH1002 reviews
1001 review
CG2251 review
COLLEGEWRI1001 review
Show 3 more courses
ENDWR1001 review
ENGLISH3011 review
ENGWRI1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values