AI Rate Professor

English

J Jordan

ENGWR301 · ENGWR100 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Mixed and ; proceed with caution and expect organization and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing reviewsScattered lecturesStrict graderClear structure for some
  • and strict, the .
  • Negative review cites fast talk, no visual aids, and .
  • Positive review credits her with helping pass the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One student calls her an , while the other does not describe grade ease.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings split between hard and easy, with comments ranging from clear lessons to fast, .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Neither review .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One and another calls her a great, helpful teacher.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Negative ; no strong evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly verbal vocabulary quizzes are mentioned, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Teaching quality swings from horrible and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Writing-focused course with weekly verbal vocabulary quizzes and essay-oriented outcomes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

structure to scattered, lecture-heavy classes with strict grading.

Main concern

Organization and strict verbal quizzes may frustrate students who need visual structure.

What students said

“she is horrible, she's so scattered and and lectures the entire class with no visual aids”
ENGWR301
“Her lessons are easy and . She would give you a great structure on how to be a successful writer.”
ENGWR100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention weekly verbal vocabulary quizzes but .

Weekly verbal vocabulary quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

One course used weekly verbal vocabulary quizzes; .

Weekly verbal vocabulary quizzes
“she and she is an ”
ENGWR301

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do NOT take English Writing 301 with this teacher, she is horrible, she's so scattered and unorganized”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with conflicting tones. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Consistency

48/100

“she's so scattered and and lectures the entire class with no visual aids”

👍 Supportive Side

80/100

“Professor Jordan is a great teacher. She is interested in every student to succeed.”

⚖️

32/100

“she is an ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's so scattered and unorganized
  • Her lessons are easy and
  • talks fast and lectures the entire class with no visual aids

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she is an
  • After taking her class I

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old, contradictory reviews from 2010 and 2014 limit reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGWR1001 review
ENGWR3011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values