AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Julie Holt

N417 · NURS417 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Mixed bag for nursing pediatrics; if you need her clinical strength and can handle a tough, nitpicky style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingStrong in pediatricsNitpickyTangents in lectureHelpful in clinical
  • Reviews are sharply split between excellent peds instructor and
  • Clinical support and content knowledge praised by one student
  • Tangents, family talk, and nitpicking cited as major issues by another

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

No easy-A signals; one review rates difficulty 5 and describes a harsh, nitpicky clinical style.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Nursing pediatrics content with high reported difficulty and limited lecture focus makes the material demanding.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Neither review .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One student praises her as excellent; the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

One student reports nitpicking on everything and little help answering questions.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload not heavily detailed; focus is more on lecture quality and clinical nitpicking than assignment volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

One review calls her excellent and approachable; the other calls her the and ignored questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments focus on lecture and clinical rather than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person nursing pediatrics reviews are highly polarized: one calls her excellent and the and nitpicks everything.

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching focus and nitpicking can make the experience very frustrating.

What students said

“Julie was an excellent peds instructor. She is very even keeled and strong in peds material.”
N417
“She is the so far. She goes off on tangents during lecture and wastes a lot of time talking about her family issues.”
NURS417

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

details.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is the so far. She goes off on tangents during lecture and wastes a lot of time talking about her family issues.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and clinical themes. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Polarizing Quality

48/100

“Julie was an excellent peds instructor. She is very even keeled and strong in peds material.”

🚫

40/100

“If because she nitpicks about everything.”

🏥 Clinical Strength

70/100

“ . I was never intimidated asking questions about new things.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She goes off on tangents during lecture and wastes a lot of time talking about her family issues.
  • She did a great job of covering the varied age ranges in the little time she had.
  • Don't bother asking questions because she rarely answer them.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • You can tell she loves what she does.
  • She is very even keeled and strong in peds material.
  • She also suggests pts. you should pick for clinical.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old 2014 reviews with completely opposite views and no grade or .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

N4171 review
NURS4171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values