AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Natalia Lowey-Ball

ESLR50 · ESL · UWP · ESLG310 · UWP23 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you need a patient ESL instructor and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPolarizing PresenceNice but IneffectiveArbitrary GradingHelpful Office HoursDisorganized
  • Reviews and terrible teacher.
  • little credit for homework and quizzes.
  • Some students praise kindness and office-hour help; many .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some say she makes everyone pass, but others report arbitrary grades with little credit for .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is standard ESL or writing work, with some calling class hard and others finding only book reports.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, but students report as exhausting.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

her useless or stubborn.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Multiple students say grading feels random and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload centers on reading, book reports, quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

She is often described as nice and caring, yet .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Homework, book reports, quizzes, and lengthy written tests dominate; .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person ESL and writing support classes feel hit-or-miss: warm personality for some, stubborn and unhelpful for others.

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching quality and .

What students said

“ , but terrible as a teacher.”
UWP23
“ . She has to learn how to grade the students from other professors.”
ESLR50
“Good teacher and great person with the pleasant attitude. and easy to talk to, makes everybody to pass the class.”
ESLR50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests and and long texts; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style.

Long multi-page testsUnclear test questionsQuizzes and homework

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests can run over 10 pages with long texts and .

Long multi-page testsUnclear questionsQuizzes
“her tests consist about more than 10 pages with a lot of long texts, you don't have any idea how to answer the .”
ESLR50
“She .”
ESLR50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but terrible as a teacher. That's all I can say.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews spanning 2012-2014, highlighting polar teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Honestly, this teacher is useless. This professor should not be a teacher at college.”

⚖️

30/100

“ . She has to learn how to grade the students from other professors.”

❤️ Caring Side

70/100

“she is extremely helful during the office hour and she really cares about her students.”

👎 Recommendation

34/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , but terrible as a teacher.
  • She's very stubborn and never listens to what other says.
  • She is good and helpful in class. Her classes very interesting and you will learn a lot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • makes everybody to pass the class.
  • Class was hard and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Natalia is a .
  • Good teacher and great person with the pleasant attitude.
  • She is a terrible teacher ! !!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed but old (2012-2014) in-person reviews show consistent polarization, so signal is useful but dated.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ESLR506 reviews
UWP232 reviews
ESL1 review
ESLG3101 review
UWP1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1