AI Rate Professor

Music

Jeffrey DuPertuis

MUFHL320 · MUFHL305 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if ; this class feels like teaching yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisengagedUnclear lecturesRushed lessonsTest mistakesLow energy
  • Students say he seems uninterested and irritated when asked to review concepts.
  • Lectures are rushed or off-topic, and .
  • ; learning often came from outside sources.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Difficulty ratings are mid-high and tests had errors, so an A still takes .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students , and mistakes that made the material harder than it needed to be.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students paint a and would not seek him out again.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

One reported B and , so grading looks ordinary rather than generous.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Students note little or and early dismissals, so outside work load is light.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Comments focus on disinterest, unclear teaching, off-topic lectures, and test mistakes.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Little homework is mentioned, while tests and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students report disengagement, rushed or off-topic lectures, and ; one older comment also describes almost no teacher interaction.

Main concern

and low classroom energy make the material hard to learn from him.

What students said

“ and made mistakes on his tests.”
MUFHL305
“He acted as though he didn't want to be there teaching; textbook was custom made by him but half of the book had nothing to do with the class curriculum.”
MUFHL320
“When you need to contact him to answer questions .”
MUFHL305

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear standard in format but students report and .

In-person testsTest mistakes reported

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests contained mistakes.

In-person testsTest errors
“ and made mistakes on his tests.”
MUFHL305

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He acted as though he didn't want to be there teaching; textbook was custom made by him but half of the book had nothing to do with the class curriculum.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting disengagement and weak instruction. Credibility rating: Low.

😞 Teaching Engagement

18/100

“Professor DuPertuis gave off the attitude that he didn't want to be there.”

📚 Lecture Clarity

20/100

“He rushed through lessons; always dismissed class early;Seemed irritated when asked to go over concepts.”

🧪

35/100

“ and made mistakes on his tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • gave off the attitude that he didn't want to be there
  • rushed through lessons
  • Lectures were often off subject

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I learned more from internet

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three older reviews (2009-2014) with mixed detail and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MUFHL3052 reviews
MUFHL3201 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values