AI Rate Professor

English

Jennifer Laflam

ENGRG11 · ENGRD11 · ENGRD310 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you are part-time or ready for and strict attendance.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTons of homeworkStrict attendanceNice but toughPart-time friendlyTests too long
  • and long tests that sink grades.
  • Lower-level English sections are easier with but and phone rules.
  • Students repeatedly call her nice yet warn full-time students about workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Multiple D+/D- grades despite full attendance and harder sections.

All evidence is in-person; easier lower-level courses contrast with harsh ENGRD310 grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Lower English classes feel easy while ENGRD310 is homework-packed and .

and harder course numbers.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students say as absence, and phones out also get marked absent.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Some recommend lower classes and call her nice, but and D grades.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report and completed homework in ENGRD310.

Format shift

Harsh grades cluster in ENGRD310; ENGRG11 students call grading easy and fair.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Repeated complaints of tons of , and add-on assignments.

Format shift

Heavy load is mainly ENGRD310; lower courses sound lighter.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Often described as nice, cheerful, and helpful, but grading and workload frustrate many.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and .

Format shift

and long tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

ENGRD310 is homework-heavy with harsh grades, while ENGRG11/ENGRD11 feel easier with but and phone rules.

Main concern

Full-time students get buried in homework and can still earn Ds.

What students said

“Tons of homework!! Ridiculous amount of and adds even more on top of that.”
ENGRD310
“ though. She will mark you absent if you are late.”
ENGRG11
“ and come to every section and she still give me an D.”
ENGRD310

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as too long for the class period and paired with .

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests run long for a 1 hour 20 minute class and stack with quizzes and homework.

Long testsQuizzesHeavy homework
“The the class is only 1 hour and 20 mins long.”
ENGRD310
“Lots of , and tests.”
ENGRD310

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Tons of homework!! Ridiculous amount of and adds even more on top of that.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 , and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Reality

22/100

“Tons of homework!! Ridiculous amount of and adds even more on top of that.”

⚖️

28/100

“ and come to every section and she still give me an D.”

🚪

18/100

“ though. She will mark you absent if you are late.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • she still give me an D.
  • . She is .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Tons of homework!!
  • Lots of , and
  • if your part-time.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and always cheerful.
  • Very nice and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six consistent 2013 in-person reviews with and grade detail support a medium credibility score.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGRD3104 reviews
ENGRD111 review
ENGRG111 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather_Not_Say 1