AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Kathleen Conrad

CHEM401LAB · CHEM305 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Strong pick for lab support; for lecture, attend regularly, do all , and read ahead.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful lab instructorEasy grader (lab)Extra credit mattersTextbook prep helpful
  • mistakes
  • Lecture CHEM305 needs attendance and to pass comfortably
  • excellent for

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

, but lecture success leans on and steady attendance.

and lecture reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Lab feels easy; lecture is moderate for non-science students if they prepare.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but attending is important to understand concepts.

Evidence comes only from in-person CHEM305.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and complete .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

; lecture grades improve with .

Format shift

Based on two in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

Lab and .

Format shift

Based on two in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

; lecture quality is more mixed.

Format shift

Based on two in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Labs, paper assignments, and drive .

Format shift

Based on two in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

; lecture students stress attendance and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ . Thank you once again for a great semester!”
CHEM401LAB
“Do ALL the extra credits! the course!”
CHEM305

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; is repeatedly important.

Extra credit opportunities

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; is emphasized for final grade.

Extra credit opportunities
“Do ALL the extra credits! the course!”
CHEM305

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great lab instructor. Helpful when there is a problem with your lab, will clarify your questions and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting lab help and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🧪 Lab Support

90/100

“Great lab instructor. Helpful when there is a problem with your lab, will clarify your questions and .”

⚖️

80/100

“ . Thank you once again for a great semester!”

📌 Strategy

70/100

“Do ALL the extra credits! the course!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • will clarify your questions and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do ALL the extra credits!
  • I'm glad I passed this course

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Two somewhat mixed in-person reviews from 2012-2013 provide useful detail but limited breadth.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM3051 review
CHEM401LAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values