AI Rate Professor

English

Robert Stanley

ENGWR302 · ENGWR100 · EMGWR300 · ENG300 · ENGWR301 · ENGWR1177 · ENGWR300 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want support more than hardcore writing skill gains.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy AVery ApproachableLenient DeadlinesHelpful MentorLight Workload
  • Students call him extremely easy and a walk in the park if you do the essays.
  • , and open to student opinions with .
  • Some say you will not learn much writing craft if you want a rigorous English course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Most students and leniency, and the grade is a walk in the park.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Content and topics are repeatedly called not hard with and generous time.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

, but comments stress showing up and .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

, and help, with a few warning about weak skill growth.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Late papers and rewrites are allowed, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

82/100

and a research project, with plenty of time until due dates.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many call him awesome, open, and helpful, though and does not teach deeply.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades center on essays, midterms as papers, and a .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person English writing classes are widely seen as easy, lenient, and weak.

Main concern

Students seeking rigorous writing instruction may feel they .

What students said

“extremely easy, just do most of your work and its a walk in the park.”
ENG300
“ .”
ENGWR300
“if ur serious about learning English writing, then this is not the right professor for u.”
ENGWR302

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly essays and .

Essay-based midterms and finalPaper rewritesClear writing expectations

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final writing performance, with rewrites sometimes allowed.

Essay midtermsEssay finalPaper rewrites
“Your grades will be entirely based off 2 mid-terms & the final.”
ENGWR100
“He lets you re-do a .”
ENGWR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“extremely easy, just do most of your work and its a walk in the park. extremely approachable. this is what a college teacher should be like.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews, highlighting ease, support, and limited rigor. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Easy A Reputation

88/100

“extremely easy, just do most of your work and its a walk in the park.”

👍

80/100

“ . Thanks Professor Stanley!”

⚠️ Limited Writing Growth

40/100

“if ur serious about learning English writing, then this is not the right professor for u.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He lets you have an opinion and does not contradict it in your essays!
  • and approachable. !
  • extremely approachable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • just do most of your work and its a walk in the park.
  • His is very lenient with turning in .
  • .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and helps you out in anyway that you need.
  • Such a fun.
  • and cares about his class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eighteen detailed in-person reviews from 2006-2013 show consistent ease and kindness themes but are older with no grade or .

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGWR3005 reviews
ENG3004 reviews
ENGWR1003 reviews
ENGWR3023 reviews
EMGWR3001 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGWR11771 review
ENGWR3011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values