AI Rate Professor

English

S. Leung-Crawford

ENGWR51 · WR50 · ENGWR100 · ENGLISH50 · ENGLISH100 · ENGWR5059 · ENG50 · ENGWR300 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.6

The decision

and fair second chances on writing.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHighly RecommendedRewrites AllowedCaring MentorClear FeedbackEasy to Pass
  • Nearly all students call her wonderful, passionate, and the .
  • , and detailed feedback to raise grades.
  • Classes are generally easy to pass if you engage; one outlier says they learned nothing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Revisions, , and easy-to-pass comments make strong grades realistic with dedication.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students say the class is not hard and easy to pass, while still teaching writing skills.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

but missing class can cost about 150 attendance points.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Almost every review strongly recommends her for , and care, with rare dissent.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

, and to improve scores.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

75/100

Workload feels manageable; .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students praise thorough lectures, one-on-one help, enthusiasm, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Essays, revisions, midterms, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as , and grade-friendly with revisions and help.

Main concern

if , and one student felt they learned little.

What students said

“This is an awsome teacher. ”
ENGWR100
“ and let you revise your work for better grade.”
ENGWR300
“I learned nothing from her class; I remmber only la-la -la bla-bla -bla from her class.”
WR50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Writing assessments allow revisions and .

Essay revisionsExtra creditMakeup opportunitiesMidterm and final with recovery

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students can revise essays and and makeups.

Essay makeupsRevisions for better gradeExtra credit
“She allows you .”
ENGWR100
“if you do not pass a ”
ENGWR5059

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher is the so far in my college experience. She is always willing to help out her students so that they will become better writers.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews, highlighting care, revisions, and strong recommendations. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Excellence

92/100

“Wonderful teacher. Kind hearted. Very thorough and helpful.”

👍

92/100

“ ”

⚖️ Fair Second Chances

86/100

“ and let you revise your work for better grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great lecturer, and steadily aids in students reaching their full potential.
  • She gives a lot of feedback and talks to her students in areas for improvement in writing.
  • class room.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her classes were easy to pass.
  • .
  • the class is not hard and it does really teach you alot

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • .
  • she cares a lot about her students and wants to help them pass.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen mostly detailed in-person reviews from 2005-2013 are highly consistent on teaching quality and grade support.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3004 reviews
ENGWR1003 reviews
ENG502 reviews
ENGWR50592 reviews
ENGLISH1001 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGLISH501 review
ENGWR511 review
WR501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1