AI Rate Professor

English

Naomi Williams

ENGWR302 · ENGWR100 · ENGWR300 · ENGWR301 · ENG300 · ENGWR59 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want to become a better writer and are willing to put in .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate literature teacherHeavy writing feedbackRevision-friendlyEngaging and funnyWorth the work
  • Extremely high teaching quality with passion for literature and writing improvement
  • Grades require real effort and strong essays, but revisions help raise scores
  • Workload is moderate writing volume with lots of

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some lower-level sections feel easy with effort, but upper writing courses require serious work and are not free As.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is approachable writing and literature work with .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, so .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Nearly every student strongly recommends her for English and writing improvement.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Not an , but timed revisions and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Students report lots of writing on interesting topics, but not an if done on time.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students repeatedly call her passionate, engaging, helpful, and one of the .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades center on essays and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and willingness to let revisions improve grades; many say work is worthwhile even when an A is not easy.

Main concern

Getting an A takes real writing effort and consistent on-time work.

What students said

“ so !”
ENGWR300
“Getting an A in her class isn't the easiest thing.”
ENGWR301
“ and you will get an easy A.”
ENGWR59

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and writing work and .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students mainly discuss essays and revisions; .

Essay-focused assessment
“She is not easy in but if you turn them on time you can revise it and turn it again for a better grade.”
ENGWR301

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ so !”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2013, highlighting teaching passion, writing workload, and grade effort. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“One of the .”

✍️

90/100

“She gives a ridiculous amount of feedback, but this serves to improve you as a writer.”

👍 Recommendation

93/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Effort

58/100

“You WILL have to work your butt off to get a good grade, but she makes it worthwhile and interesting.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is has a passion for literature and teaching.
  • Great lecture style and even brings food for her students
  • Cool Teacher very interactive class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Getting an A in her class isn't the easiest thing.
  • You WILL have to work your butt off to get a good grade
  • you will get an easy A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and she is a really nice teacher.
  • She's flexible and willing to help

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

and positive, but all are older (2009-2013) with no recent sample.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3013 reviews
ENG3001 review
ENGWR1001 review
ENGWR3001 review
ENGWR3021 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGWR591 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values