AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Emilie Mitchell

PSYC300 · PSYC356 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you like energetic, candid lecture style, but expect mixed clarity reports and possible higher difficulty.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHilarious and enthusiasticRecords lecturesPolarizing clarityCan feel self-focusedEngaging early classes
  • Two strong reviews praise humor, clarity, recorded lectures, and syllabus follow-through.
  • One , and self-absorbed.
  • Overall quality is .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

Difficulty ratings include a 5 and no easy-A language; effort and clarity vary by student.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Average difficulty about 3.7 with one review rating difficulty at 5 and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Lectures are recorded for absences, but students are warned not to be late and praise wanting to attend.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Two glowing recommendations outweigh one strong avoid review, yielding a net positive but .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; outcomes seem tied to lecture engagement more than .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, but higher difficulty and lecture-heavy expectations keep load from feeling light.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

, and interesting, while one student reports arrogance and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments center on lectures and syllabus follow-through without a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

humor and clarity and one complaint about arrogance and poor explanation.

Main concern

Mixed teaching clarity and personality fit; one student found class boring and unclear.

What students said

“ . She is hilarious, enthusiastic, and .”
PSYC356
“I do not recommend her and and not a dr.”
PSYC300
“Great teacher very interesting makes you want to go to class.”
PSYC300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . She is hilarious, enthusiastic, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, balancing strong praise with one sharp negative. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“ . She is hilarious, enthusiastic, and .”

⚠️ Polarizing Fit

35/100

“She is so stuck on herself. She's constantly patting herself on the back for her PhD.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“ . and she followed her syllabus.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hilarious, enthusiastic, and
  • She records her lectures so if we miss class we can access them online
  • and she followed her syllabus.

Theme 2

📉 Negative Experiences

  • Lacks giving examples or explaining things clearly
  • The class was very boring and wish I wouldn't have taken her class

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cusses a lot, but it's all in fun
  • I'm always eager to get up for her class
  • She's constantly patting herself on the back for her PhD

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three reviews from 2007-2013 show mixed quality scores and decent detail but small sample and older dates.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYC3002 reviews
PSYC3561 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values