AI Rate Professor

Languages

Jim Henderson

ASL1 · SILA306 · SILA305 · ASL2 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already tolerate a blunt, high-ego teaching style and have no better ASL option.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing personalityRude correctionsFair quizzes claimedSelf-fulfilling motivesPatient with some
  • Reviews and rude demeaning classroom style.
  • Quizzes and , but several students felt demeaned.
  • Overall quality sits low; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some report fair quizzes and a B with normal effort, but comments do not paint a free A path.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Difficulty ratings cluster mid-range; preparation helps, but interpersonal friction can make the class feel harder.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Reviews do not clearly state an .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Negative reviews dominate on personality and teaching motives, outweighing a minority of positive experiences.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Supporters say quizzes and tests are graded fairly and returned quickly; as the main problem.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Comments focus more on classroom tone than on assignment volume, suggesting a normal language-course load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Positives mention patience and fair tests, but many describe rudeness, sarcasm, poor organization, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Students mention quizzes and dominant weight.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ASL and interpreting classes with strongly mixed reviews: and preparation, others call him rude, sarcastic, and demeaning.

Main concern

Classroom interpersonal tone can feel hurtful or performative for some students.

What students said

“He is rude and sarcastic. He tries to make a spectacle of his students instead of teaching them.”
ASL2
“Quizzes and and graded more than fairly and usually handed back within a week.”
SILA305
“awful!!!!!!!!!! .”
ASL1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are regular quizzes and tests; .

Quizzes and testsIn-person assessmentsFair grading claimed by some

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests that some call fair and timely; .

In-person quizzesIn-person tests
“Quizzes and and graded more than fairly and usually handed back within a week.”
SILA305
“Tests and .”
SILA306

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He tries to make a spectacle of his students instead of teaching them.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 polarized in-person reviews focused on teaching tone versus fair testing. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“He Sucks! He is rude and sarcastic.”

⚖️

58/100

“Quizzes and and graded more than fairly and usually handed back within a week.”

👎 Classroom Climate

25/100

“He could be hurtful (perceived as demeaning) with .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“awful!!!!!!!!!! . hated every minute of his class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • class time was well used
  • He appears to present himself as very self fullfilling.

Theme 2

💬 About Personality

  • rude and sarcastic
  • Very sassy
  • hurtful (perceived as demeaning) with

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Quizzes and and graded more than fairly
  • Tests and
  • Got a B in the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Seven in-person reviews from 2005-2013 are detailed and thematically consistent on personality conflict, despite age and polarity.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ASL12 reviews
ASL22 reviews
SILA3052 reviews
SILA3061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values