AI Rate Professor

Computer Information Systems

Kathy Camarena

CISA308 · POWERPOINT · CISA340 · XP · CISC320 · INTROINTERNET · CISA305340 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you want demanding, career-useful skills training; skip if you need a chill easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingThorough but DemandingGrade ControversiesControl Freak ClaimsSkills Drill Focus
  • Reviews split hard between thorough skill-building praise and harsh personal or .
  • Strong for PowerPoint and office-skill depth if you want rigor and can tolerate strictness.
  • Several students allege grade deflation, control issues, or unfair treatment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Motivated students can earn solid grades, but some report tougher grading than expected or .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Word can feel easy while PowerPoint and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

the review set.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half strongly recommend her skill drills while .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Demanding assignments and at least one claim of receiving a lower grade than earned pull leniency down.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

but demanding and thorough for others.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Praised as thorough and by critics.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Course value centers on lab and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and presentation skills, others report boredom, control issues, or unfair grades.

Main concern

Inconsistent fairness and a demanding control-oriented style.

What students said

“She's a great teacher. Very thorough and helpful. Great communication!”
CISA340
“She's tough, but she will drill into you important basics that will become second nature”
POWERPOINT
“i earned an A in the class, but she gave me a B in the class instead.”
XP

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize assignments and .

Assignment DrivenSkills Practice

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and presentation skills with little explicit exam-policy detail.

Assignment DrivenSkills Practice
“She has a good lecture, and is demanding in her assignments.”
CISC320
“Assignments and expectations were reasonable, and she let you correct them if you submitted them early enough.”
CISA308

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's tough, but she will drill into you important basics that will become second nature”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, highlighting skill rigor and polarized fairness claims. Credibility rating: Medium.

🛠️ Skill Building

70/100

“take her for powerpoint and it will pay off HUGE when you get to classes later on”

⚖️ Fairness Concerns

30/100

“i earned an A in the class, but she gave me a B in the class instead.”

📊 Polarized Reputation

48/100

“She's a great teacher. Very thorough and helpful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very thorough and helpful
  • control freak
  • really boring class and teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • if I'd been more motivated I could've earned an A
  • demanding in her assignments
  • gave me a B in the class instead

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness

  • practices distrimination and harrasses students
  • act as though we were in 4th grade

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Nine older polarized reviews provide useful detail but limited consensus and no recent sample.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CISA3082 reviews
CISC3202 reviews
CISA3053401 review
CISA3401 review
INTROINTERNET1 review
Show 2 more courses
POWERPOINT1 review
XP1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1