AI Rate Professor

English

Richard Clemons

ENG300 · ENGWR100 · ENGWR300 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you can build rapport early; otherwise his personality and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing PersonalityCreative FreedomDoable Nightly HomeworkEasy If LikedPretentious
  • some call him enjoyable and low-stress, others call him pretentious and unfair.
  • but short and doable for those who click with him.
  • and harsh if he dislikes you.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Class can feel easy and low-stress if he likes you, but if he does not.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Nightly short papers are light for many students, and creative freedom keeps stress low when the fit is good.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; some simply enjoy going to class.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation hinges on whether you connect with him personally and tolerate his style.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

; others say he grades ridiculously hard if he dislikes you.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

72/100

Nightly homework is usually 1-3 pages and described as very doable.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Fans praise creative freedom and approachability; , and pretentious.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Short nightly essays and creative writing drive the course; exams are not discussed.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and low-stress to unfair and pretentious depending on student-teacher fit.

Main concern

Personality clash and a bad experience.

What students said

“It was truly awesome going to his class, He allowed you to express yourself without .”
ENGWR300
“He is the . HORRIBLE GUY... he is a pretentious creep.”
ENG300
“There is but it is very doable.”
ENG300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If he doesn't like you he will grade you ridiculously hard otherwise, his class is so easy it's a joke.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting personality fit, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎭 Polarizing Experience

55/100

“He is the . HORRIBLE GUY... he is a pretentious creep.”

✍️ Creative Freedom

70/100

“Allows one to be creative with essays. Very easy to talk to.”

📝 Workload Reality

72/100

“ but nothing more than 1 pagers 2 pagers and a few 3 pagers!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Allows one to be creative with essays.
  • It is truly enjoyable to attend class
  • Pretentious!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • his class is so easy it's a joke
  • he will grade you ridiculously hard
  • There is but it is very doable.

Theme 3

💬 About Personality Fit

  • he is a pretentious creep
  • Very easy to talk to.
  • try talking to him one on one!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Five mixed reviews from 2010 show clear polarization but a small sample and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG3002 reviews
ENGWR3002 reviews
ENGWR1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values