AI Rate Professor

Aeronautics

Alan Woodhead

AERO301 · AERO322 · AERO300 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want an aviation-passionate instructor and can handle uneven help and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate About AviationMixed HelpfulnessOpinionated TeachingInconsistent Support
  • Students agree he is knowledgeable and passionate about aeronautics.
  • some feel .
  • and slow responses reduce reliability for grade-sensitive students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

No free-A claims; borderline grades can suffer under his no plus-minus style.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings sit around moderate with no strong easy or brain-burner consensus.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Some aviation students strongly encourage him, while .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

One review criticizes no plus-minus grading that can hurt borderline students.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload is not a major complaint; focus is more on teaching style and help quality.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Passion and knowledge are praised, but explanations and help quality are inconsistent.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly show whether .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person aero courses show a passionate instructor with , and .

Main concern

and support slow or unhelpful.

What students said

“I found Alan very knowledgeable and passionate about our subject.”
AERO322
“This teacher is useless. He doesn't grade with + or - so if you're borderline, then you're screwed.”
AERO300
“HE IS REALLY HELPFULL, ALSO HE STICKS WITH WHAT HE THINK IS RIGHT.”
AERO301

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

student comments.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I found Alan very knowledgeable and passionate about our subject.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting passion, mixed help, and . Credibility rating: Low.

✈️ Passion and Knowledge

70/100

“I found Alan very knowledgeable and passionate about our subject.”

🧩 Mixed Help Quality

40/100

“Ask him a question and prepare because he'll just spew whatever he can think of on the spot”

📣 Motivation vs Frustration

55/100

“HE REALLY MOTIVATES YOU A LOT.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He encourages students (myself included) to learn more than just the requirements
  • Alan is more interested in what he thinks is right then what is right in the book.
  • HE REALLY HELPS YOU WITH YOUR WORK

Theme 2

📉 About Support and Grading

  • He doesn't grade with + or - so if you're borderline, then you're screwed.
  • took him 8 weeks to get respond.
  • he was almost useless as far as help went in the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 mixed reviews from 2007-2011 give limited and somewhat conflicting evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AERO3012 reviews
AERO3001 review
AERO3221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values