AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Katia Fuchs

MATH300 · WLD57 · STAT300 · MATH120 · MATH370 · MATH110 · WLD55 · MATH134 · STATS300 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if , and frequent lateness.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOften LateDisorganizedHelpful When PreparedPop QuizzesSlow Grading
  • Students split between clear and and disorganization.
  • Attendance and while she herself is frequently late.
  • Grading and grade outcomes feel inconsistent, including one unexplained F.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Homework and tests can be manageable for an A if you keep up, but and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

and hard to absorb when she rushes.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and as mandatory, with risk of being dropped for .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Some call her great and helpful, while others urge avoiding her due to lateness and disorganization.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Not a , but slow returns and at least one unexplained failing grade hurt trust.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework and tests are common; one course notes no required homework while and HW.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

and smart, but lateness, weak prep, and limited student interaction pull quality down.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and finals, with surprise quizzes mentioned.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and helpful, many report lateness, disorganization, slow returns, and uneven support.

Main concern

, and inconsistent communication.

What students said

“Barely on time or late to class EVERY day, but .”
MATH300
“She teaches well and . However, she takes a and quizzes.”
MATH370
“I thought I was doing well . She never answered any of my e-mails.”
STATS300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and quizzes with occasional surprise quizzes and delayed study guides.

Tests and QuizzesPop QuizzesStudy Guides Posted Late

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes of mixed difficulty; pop quizzes without warning and late study-guide posts appear in comments.

In-Person TestsPop QuizzesLate Study Guides
“she keeps throwing random quizes without any warnings and expects you to know everything”
MATH300
“The 9pm the night before, not helpful.”
STATS300
“ ”
MATH120

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Barely on time or late to class EVERY day, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews (2007-2011), highlighting lateness, organization, and mixed teaching quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

⏰ Chronic Lateness

30/100

“Barely on time or late to class EVERY day, but .”

📚 Mixed Teaching Clarity

52/100

“ and helpful. Tests and .”

🗂️ Disorganization Risk

35/100

“ . Takes her 2 and quizes.”

👍 Occasional Strong Praise

80/100

“Katia was so great;helpful, encouraging, and . Take her class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches well and .
  • and precise and .
  • She talks and moves through the material at 1000 mph

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • on tests and get an A
  • I thought I was doing well .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Sort of disorganized and always 5-10 minutes late to class.
  • Never returns HW.
  • She is always late, even on posting hw and tests online.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen detailed but old (2007-2011) in-person reviews show a consistent mixed pattern with enough detail for moderate confidence.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH3703 reviews
STATS3003 reviews
MATH1202 reviews
MATH3002 reviews
MATH1101 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1341 review
STAT3001 review
WLD551 review
WLD571 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values