AI Rate Professor

English

Carol McKenzie

ENGRW300 · ENGWR100 · ENGWR · ENG302 · ENG100 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Only take her if , and do not need an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of essaysGrammar-focused gradingPlays favoritismPicks on studentsHard to get an A
  • and and unfair.
  • , and her preferred style.
  • and classroom pick-on dynamics are recurring complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Multiple students say few As are given and ; she is not an easy-A teacher.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and high difficulty ratings make the content feel demanding.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students report .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

About half praise her help and organization while and classroom picking-on.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

As, and penalties when writing does not match her preferred form.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students repeatedly mention many essays and a heavy first-day workload scare.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Helpful and encouraging for engaged students, but others report boring classes, favoritism, and harsh treatment.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

; grammar and mechanics weigh heavily.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English courses feature , and mixed reports of helpful mentoring versus favoritism and harshness.

Main concern

, and being picked on in class can make the experience stressful.

What students said

“Barely 2 or 3 people got an A.”
ENGWR100
“ and experienced. She focuses on grammar instead of content”
ENG302
“mckenzie invites you to develop your own writing style, your own voice, but then penalizes you for doing so.”
ENGWR

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly essays and occasional tests; one review notes an .

Essay-heavy assessmentMidterm mentionedGrammar and mechanics focus

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and at least one midterm, without clear open-book or proctoring detail.

Midterm mentionedEssay-heavyGrammar focus
“very hard class w/ her as a teacher... but then hella people failed...”
ENG302

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you want an easy A then she is not your teacher”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person English reviews, , and split personality reports. Credibility rating: High.

📝 Hard A Reality

32/100

“Barely 2 or 3 people got an A.”

📚

34/100

“you have to do alot of essays in her class though so if you want an easy A then she is not your teacher”

⚠️ Favoritism Concerns

28/100

“SHe does play favortism and she likes to say she is open to things but her opnion always holds higher than yours.”

Theme 1

✍️ About Writing Style

  • She focuses on grammar instead of .
  • the most important thing about writing to her is punctuation, sentence structure, spelling.
  • don't be creative in this class and don't think critically.

Theme 2

❤️ About Help vs Harshness

  • She is really a great teacher. Just come talk to her if you have trouble, she will help you a lot.
  • if you want to get a low grade!
  • Very easy going and very concerned about students professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews over several years with rich detail and consistent polarization give high credibility.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1004 reviews
3023 reviews
ENG3023 reviews
ENGWR1003 reviews
ENGWR2 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ENGRW3001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values