AI Rate Professor

English

Joseph Romano

ENGWR100 · ENTER300 · ENG300 · ENG100 · ENGWR300 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you want to improve as a writer and and rewrites; avoid if you need an easy composition A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful with rewritesTough paper graderStrong writing feedbackExpects real effortClear handouts
  • Many students credit him with making them and office hours.
  • low paper grades.
  • and put serious effort into composition.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Rewrites help, but multiple reviews describe tough expectations and hard-earned grades rather than free As.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Composition work is demanding, with high difficulty ratings and comments that the class is not a piece of cake.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

need to put in effort and seek help.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Students , while others dislike the toughness or course style.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Feedback and rewrite chances help, but several students call paper grading tough or even automatic low marks.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

College composition papers, revisions, and high effort expectations make the load feel substantial.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Often described as , and caring about student writing growth.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and exercises rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

students, paper-focused assessment, and mixed feelings about toughness and class activities like blogging.

Main concern

if you do not revise and invest serious effort.

What students said

“ and allowes you edit them to get a better grade.”
ENGWR300
“when a student turns in .”
ENGWR100
“He is excellent and exercises that really help you learn the material.”
ENG300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and rewrites; reviews do not clearly prove closed-book exams or proctoring.

Paper-based assessmentRewrites allowed

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and rewrites rather than documented proctored exams.

PapersRewrite opportunitiesWriting feedback
“ and allowes you edit them to get a better grade.”
ENGWR300
“when a student turns in .”
ENGWR100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I started the class with , yet by the end of the semester I was capable of writing an A paper.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews on writing help, toughness, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

✍️ Writing Growth

70/100

“I started the class with , yet by the end of the semester I was capable of writing an A paper.”

⚖️

32/100

“when a student turns in .”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ . He is an extremely helpful teacher and wants his students to to leave his class and have the ”

📚

72/100

“He is excellent and exercises that really help you learn the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's extremely intelligent and helpful.
  • He is funny, and very interesting.
  • He genuinely cares about making students better writers.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • just know the class isn't a piece of cake.
  • he's a little too tough and expects more than should be for the class
  • allowes you edit them to get a better grade.

Theme 3

💬 About Course Format

  • Blogging for college composition class?? Really? Blogging?

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Nine mixed older reviews with some detail on teaching and grading, but no grade distribution or recent comments.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR3005 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENG3001 review
ENGWR1001 review
ENTER3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values