AI Rate Professor

English

Carol MacKenzie

ENGWR100 · ENG302 · ENG300 · ENG100 · ENGWR300 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if you want a patient writing coach who helps you actually improve, especially for EngWr100/300, but expect and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful writing coachCreative freedom on essaysWalks you through to EngWr300Very easy grader for manyTough A gatekeeper for some
  • Most students praise her as kind, approachable, and the .
  • Essay-heavy load with multiple out-of-class and in-class papers, but she guides students step by step.
  • One older review calls her a dull class and grade gatekeeper who blocks many As.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many call her an and report As with guidance, but and one says she limits how many get As.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Lower-level writing feels guided and doable without novels, while Eng 302 is described as very difficult with huge work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

as a wonderful, helpful English teacher who prepares transfer-ready writers.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Several call her a and report As, but one review says she controls and limits high grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Typical load is multiple out-of-class essays, research papers, and in-class essays, with Eng 302 called a huge amount of work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and lasting writing skill gains, with only one dull-class critique.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on essays and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

guidance, creative essay freedom, and real skill growth, tempered by one harsh grade-gatekeeping complaint.

Main concern

As are tightly controlled.

What students said

“By far the . I left really knowing how to write a lot better then before.”
ENGWR300
“ . if you want to REALLY learn english”
ENG100
“She doesn't allow many students to get an A in her class.”
ENG300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essay and research-paper work, including in-class essays, with little detail on formal proctored exams.

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and research papers rather than clearly described closed-book tests.

In-class essaysResearch paperMultiple out-of-class essays
“There are 3 out of class essays, 1 research paper and 2 inclass essays.”
ENGWR300
“Although she assigns many essays (5 outside essays, 2 in class and approachable.”
ENGWR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far the . I left really knowing how to write a lot better then before. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2010, highlighting teaching quality, essay load, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“By far the . I left really knowing how to write a lot better then before.”

👍 Strong Recommendations

88/100

“ !! You will love her.”

📝 Essay-Heavy Load

48/100

“Although she assigns many essays (5 outside essays, 2 in class and approachable.”

⚖️

72/100

“ . if you want to REALLY learn english”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She lets you write the way you want it, and very nice.
  • she really walks you through ur way, next thng u know, ur ready for EngWr300.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I got an A on her class.
  • Eng 302 was very difficult and required a huge amount of work
  • She doesn't allow many students to get an A in her class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and helpful.
  • Is willing to work with you if you have any difficulties.
  • She is a pretty awesome lady.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed in-person reviews span 2005-2010 with mostly consistent praise, but the sample is older and includes one strong outlier.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGWR1003 reviews
ENG3002 reviews
ENGWR3002 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENG3021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values