AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Dana Maher

SOC321 · SOC301 · SOC300 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

with and real learning.

Best fit · Easy A HunterPassionate and helpfulLots of extra creditWeekly quizzes and binder workCool and approachableEasy workload with learning
  • All three reviews give a perfect 5 quality score with warm praise.
  • Workload is moderate weekly binder work and .
  • Students say they learned a lot while finding the class approachable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students describe non-difficult assignments plus lots of , making high grades very reachable with normal effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Difficulty ratings are low and comments call the class interesting with manageable weekly work rather than heavy theory grind.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

No review clearly .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

Every review calls her amazing or passionate, with zero negative notes.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

and non-difficult assignments make grades feel very student-friendly.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

78/100

Weekly binder suggestions and chapter quizzes require some work but are repeatedly called not difficult.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students , and cool to talk with.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Mix of weekly binder work and high-stakes exam focus.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person sociology with , and lots of that keeps difficulty low.

Main concern

Very small and older sample with .

What students said

“she offers lots of extra credits and .”
SOC300
“Absolutely amazing, passionate and helpful.”
SOC321
“this prof. was amazing”
SOC301

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on chapter quizzes and weekly work with ; reviews do not describe strict proctoring.

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and weekly binder work with options.

Chapter quizzesWeekly binder workExtra credit
“the class is a combination of weekly binder suggestion and chapter quizzes.”
SOC300
“she offers lots of extra credits and .”
SOC300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Absolutely amazing, passionate and helpful. And completely sexy!”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with uniformly positive themes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Absolutely amazing, passionate and helpful.”

🎁 Boost

88/100

“she offers lots of extra credits and .”

📚 Manageable Workload

78/100

“it is required a certian amount of workload, but she offers lots of extra credits”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Absolutely amazing, passionate and helpful.
  • this prof. was amazing
  • she is an interesting, young, cool and good to talk with.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • i've learned a lot from her class.
  • it is required a certian amount of workload, but she offers lots of extra credits

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three short in-person reviews from 2007-2010, all glowing but thin on concrete grade outcomes.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC3001 review
SOC3011 review
SOC3211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values