AI Rate Professor

Music

Megan Foley

MUSM000 · MUSM356 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already want a passive film-analysis elective and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring lecturesMovie-heavy classLittle technical skillSparse feedbackPolarized ratings
  • Only two reviews exist, so confidence is low.
  • The only substantive review calls the class boring and non-technical.
  • One high rating has no written comment, limiting useful guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate, but comments do not clearly prove an easy A path.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The detailed review describes a low-effort, movie-watching class with little technical challenge.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

The only substantive comment strongly rejects the course as boring and uninstructive.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; available evidence does not prove lenient or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

70/100

The detailed review implies light effort centered on watching and analyzing movies.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

One detailed review calls the class boring with no real-world technical instruction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

; one detailed complaint about movie-watching with no technical editing instruction.

Main concern

Students may learn little practical skill and find class unengaging.

What students said

“Couldn't stay awake in this BORING CLASS. We LEARNED NOTHING and watched Movies the whole time with ZERO technical instruction on how a film would be edited in the real world.”
MUSM000

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“FOLEY=EPIC FAIL”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with sparse detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“We LEARNED NOTHING and watched Movies the whole time with ZERO technical instruction on how a film would be edited in the real world.”

👎 Recommendation

34/100

“Couldn't stay awake in this BORING CLASS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Couldn't stay awake in this BORING CLASS.
  • Instead Foley only focused on analyzing movies for their sound content the entire time.

Theme 2

📉 About Learning Value

  • We LEARNED NOTHING
  • ZERO technical instruction on how a film would be edited in the real world.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews exist, and one has no comment, so patterns are weak and incomplete.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MUSM0001 review
MUSM3561 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values