AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Jay Aguas

ADJ304 · ADMJ304 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want a thinking-heavy ADMJ course from a subject expert, but expect opinionated lectures and mixed peer reactions.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnows SubjectThought ProvokingMixed ReviewsOpinionatedJuvenile Justice
  • Two strong reviews praise deep knowledge of juvenile justice and critical thinking.
  • One scathing review calls him lazy, blustery, and focused on stories over facts.
  • Course difficulty is often rated high even when teaching quality is praised.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

High difficulty ratings and no easy-A language mean an A likely needs real effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students repeatedly rated difficulty high and noted heavy thinking demands.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Majority praise learning value, though one review strongly advises against him.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

No detailed grade curves or leniency claims; .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Difficulty is high and content is thinking-heavy, but .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

65/100

Most reviewers say he knows the subject and makes students think; one calls lectures story-heavy and unhelpful.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews stress lectures and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ADMJ students split between strong praise for subject mastery and one sharp critique of lecture style and content focus.

Main concern

Opinionated storytelling lectures may replace clear factual instruction for some students.

What students said

“great class; learned alot”
ADMJ304
“This professor new his subject. Made us think about Juvenile justice and not just presented facts.”
ADJ304
“ .”
ADMJ304

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor new his subject. Made us think about Juvenile justice and not just presented facts.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting subject mastery versus lecture-style complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“This professor new his subject. Made us think about Juvenile justice and not just presented facts.”

👍 Recommendation

62/100

“great class; learned alot”

⚠️ Negative Outlier

30/100

“He's blustery, very opinionated, and his lectures are comprised of stories, not facts.”

📈 Difficulty

35/100

“Unfortunately, this lazy instructor has his students analyzing art films as opposed to actually learning about Juvenile Delinquency.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Made us think about Juvenile justice and not just presented facts.
  • his lectures are comprised of stories, not facts.
  • great class; learned alot

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Content

  • analyzing art films as opposed to actually learning about Juvenile Delinquency.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only four old (2009-2010) in-person reviews with mixed views and limited grade or .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ADJ3042 reviews
ADMJ3042 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values