AI Rate Professor

English

T. Mahmood

ENGWR302 · ENGLW300 · ENG302 · ENGW100 · ENGWR301 · ENGLISH · ENG · ENGWR300 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless you already write well and want a strict grammar-focused English instructor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh Grammar FocusBoring LecturesLittle Paper FeedbackTough GraderEssay Heavy
  • Many students report low paper grades with .
  • Lectures are often called boring and slow, with .
  • A minority found him useful for academic writing if they sought him out and worked hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Several students report Ds and section described as an easy A.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is standard college writing with weekly essays and dense textbooks, not introductory fluff.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most comments urge staying , and boring teaching.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students repeatedly cite grammar nitpicking and low scores with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and a presentation in some sections.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Common themes are boring lectures, slow speech, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on essays and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English writing courses with frequent essays; students , and boring lectures, with a few noting real skill gains if they push.

Main concern

.

What students said

“STAY AWAY!!!!He cares too much about grammar even if you have a .”
ENG302
“No help on why your essay had a low score just nit-pics about the smallest grammer errors.”
ENGLW300
“A tough teacher, but a good one.”
ENGWR300

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on graded essays and papers; .

Essay BasedPaper Feedback Sparse

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment is mainly out-of-class essays with .

Essay BasedGrammar Focused Grading
“Like he will give you a low grade, but no where on the it except for a few minor gramatical errors.”
ENGWR302
“You'll write 4 out-of-class essays, and a cadre of other stuff.”
ENGWR300

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“STAY AWAY!!!!He cares too much about grammar even if you have a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews, highlighting grading harshness and lecture quality. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

22/100

“just nit-pics about the smallest grammer errors.”

😴 Boring Lectures

36/100

“He is a very boring teacher. He also speak so slow.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

30/100

“ .i took his English writing 100 class and i can't wait till the semester over.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Really easy A, I don't know how anyone can get less than a C.
  • I got a freakin D in his class.
  • your narrative story was very good! but you have grammer problems

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a very boring teacher.
  • It took over half a semester
  • You can really get a lot from this guy if you apply yourself.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve older in-person reviews (2005-2009) and teaching quality but lack recent data.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 57
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGLW3002 reviews
ENGWR3002 reviews
ENGWR3022 reviews
3001 review
ENG1 review
Show 4 more courses
ENG3021 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGW1001 review
ENGWR3011 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values