AI Rate Professor

Art History

Hannah Tandeta

ART004 · ARTHISTORY · ART1 · ART4 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid unless you can follow every instruction exactly and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderCondescending ToneSubjective GradingHeavy PapersInconsistent Quality
  • Recent and .
  • Workload and class.
  • A minority praise and structure, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

can help, but tough and subjective grading makes a clean A require precise compliance and heavy effort.

Online has both A+ success and F disasters; and subjective projects.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

, and and study load high for many students.

Both formats stress reading and papers; if you like art.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and sometimes required, with no single consistent rule across reviews.

Online and in-person both show mixed mandatory versus optional reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Only about one in , and recent comments often say .

Recent online and glowing in-person posts.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough-grader tags, subjective project scores, and .

Format shift

Online critiques feel especially severe; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of papers, reading, memorization, and GE ease.

Format shift

and papers; a few online students say the essay count is manageable.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Many call her condescending and unhelpful, while a smaller group praises knowledge and energy.

Format shift

and in-person frustration.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Art research projects, essays, quizzes, and work.

Format shift

Online stresses papers and reading quizzes; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews range from old enthusiasm to and .

Main concern

and condescending tone when challenged.

What students said

“Crossed off a whole portion of though I provided highlighted screenshots”
ARTHISTORY
“Easy and boring classes but and . !!”
ART1
“ , and her enthusiasm for the subject just makes the class even more exciting”
ARTHISTORY

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews , and heavy papers, with a few extra-credit success stories.

Main concern

, and accusations or point losses that feel unfair.

What students said

“I would advise absolutely NO ONE to take her class, ever! 100% the .”
ARTHISTORY
“she will critique you and not give you solutions on what you can do differently or how you can learn from it.”
ART1
“She wants students to succeed, so she always offered help if needed.”
ART004

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests and quizzes reward heavy study, and written projects are graded strictly and subjectively.

Hard Quizzes and TestsMemorization HeavySubjective Project GradingPaper-Focused

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and large image memorization for midterms.

Hard EssaysHard TestsImage MemorizationSubjective Projects
“Easy and boring classes but and .”
ART1
“We were expected to memorize about 150 picture for the .”
ART004

Online

Online students describe complex quizzes and finals plus strict paper standards; .

Complex QuizzesStrict Paper RubricsFinal Project Scrutiny
“her tests and if you don't plan to "actually study" for them.”
ARTHISTORY
“Accused me of working with another student on the final because we chose the same two artists.”
ARTHISTORY

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would advise absolutely NO ONE to take her class, ever! 100% the . She gives a ridiculous amount of work and an .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews across online and and tone complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

22/100

“Crossed off a whole portion of though I provided highlighted screenshots of the info”

🗣️ Tone Problems

30/100

“Can be very condescending, especially if you are not a native English speaker.”

📝 Heavy Papers

30/100

“She gives a ridiculous amount of work and an .”

👍 Minority Praise

70/100

“She wants students to succeed, so she always offered help if needed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Got an ego for sure and doesn't like being contradicted.
  • She really knows her stuff and wants you to do well.
  • Incredibly slow and mediocre "professor".

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Just follow her requirements TO THE LETTER and you will succeed.
  • no standard to follow.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very snarky and condescending.
  • Condescending and rude. Should be fired.
  • I loved Ms. Tandeta she was such a great teacher, always hip and energetic.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

17 reviews over many years are detailed but split by era, so but sample is moderate.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ARTHISTORY9 reviews
ART14 reviews
ART0043 reviews
ART41 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1